From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] account_system_vtime() should be a macro, not a function
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:43:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610191543.18951.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061019014446.36410c81.akpm@osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 730 bytes --]
[PATCH] account_system_vtime() should be a macro, not a function
Because the way 'current' is implemented on some archs, it's better to use a
null macro for account_system_vtime(current)
I discovered that gcc was (correctly) issuing one useless instruction (to
load %rax with current from pda) on x86_64 on irq_enter() and __irq_exit()
This saves few bytes in kernel size, on archs where current is 'asm volatile'
Sample of asm code :
<smp_apic_timer_interrupt>:
...
callq <exit_idle>
mov %gs:0x0,%rax // useless load of pda.'pcurrent' into %rax
mov %gs:0x10,%rax
addl $0x10000,0xffffffffffffe044(%rax) //
add_preempt_count(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
[-- Attachment #2: account_system_vtime.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 478 bytes --]
--- linux/include/linux/hardirq.h 2006-10-19 15:13:34.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-ed/include/linux/hardirq.h 2006-10-19 15:15:58.000000000 +0200
@@ -95,9 +95,11 @@
struct task_struct;
#ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
-static inline void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-}
+/*
+ * It's better to provide a macro and not a function
+ * because the way 'current' is implemented on some archs
+ */
+#define account_system_vtime(X) do {} while (0)
#endif
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-19 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-17 15:47 [Bug 185] Sometimes kernel freezes sometime lists OOPS - hostap_cs CIJOML
2006-10-19 6:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-19 8:12 ` CIJOML
2006-10-19 8:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-19 9:51 ` CIJOML
2006-10-19 13:43 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-10-19 13:46 ` [PATCH] account_system_vtime() should be a macro, not a function Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610191543.18951.dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox