public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 04/10] uml: make execvp safe for our usage
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 03:16:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610210316.38732.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061018183707.GB6566@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>

On Wednesday 18 October 2006 20:37, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:27:11PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso 
wrote:
> > Reimplement execvp for our purposes - after we call fork() it is
> > fundamentally unsafe to use the kernel allocator - current is not valid
> > there.
>
> This is horriby ugly.  Can we instead do something different like
> check out the paths of helpers at early boot, before the kernel is
> running, save them, and simply execve them later?
>
> At that point, something like running "which foo" would be fine by me.

I'd add that this can IMHO cause hard-to-diagnose crashes (I've seen strange 
behaviours in debug mode, and even schedule-while-atomic warnings, maybe 
because the creator thread had gone in atomic mode), and since this is a 
working fix, either this or a replacement should go in.
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-21  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-17 21:19 [PATCH 00/10] Various UML patches for 2.6.19 Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 01/10] uml: remove some leftover PPC code Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 02/10] uml: split memory allocation prototypes out of user.h Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 03/10] uml: fix prototypes Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-18 18:32   ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2006-10-21  1:42     ` Blaisorblade
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] uml: make execvp safe for our usage Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-18 18:37   ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2006-10-21  0:11     ` Blaisorblade
2006-10-25 15:10       ` Jeff Dike
2006-10-21  1:16     ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] uml: code convention cleanup of a file Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] uml: reenable compilation of enable_timer, disabled by mistake Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] uml: use DEFCONFIG_LIST to avoid reading host's config Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] uml: cleanup run_helper() API to fix a leak Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] uml: kconfig - silence warning Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-17 21:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] uml: mmapper - remove just added but wrong "const" attribute Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-10-18 18:41 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Various UML patches for 2.6.19 Jeff Dike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200610210316.38732.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox