From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, mbligh@google.com, akpm@osdl.org,
menage@google.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com,
rohitseth@google.com, holt@sgi.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:16:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061022231623.70daba00.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453C5AF4.8070707@yahoo.com.au>
Nick wrote:
> It is somewhat improved. The load balancing will now retry other CPUs,
> but this is pretty costly
Ah - ok. Sounds like a sticky problem.
I am beginning to appreciate Martin's preference for not using
cpus_allowed to pin tasks when load balancing is also needed.
For the big HPC apps that I worry about the most, with hundreds of
parallel, closely coupled threads, one per cpu, we pin all over the
place. But we make very little use of load balancing in that
situation, with one compute bound thread per cpu, humming along for
hours. The scheduler pretty quickly figures out that it has no
useful load balancing to do.
On the other hand, as someone already noted, one can't simulate pinning
to overlapping cpus_allowed masks using overlapping sched domains, as
tasks can just wander off onto someone elses cpu that way.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-23 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-19 9:23 [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets Paul Jackson
2006-10-19 10:24 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 19:03 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-19 19:21 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 19:50 ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-20 0:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 16:03 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 17:29 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-20 19:19 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 19:00 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 20:30 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2006-10-20 21:41 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 22:35 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2006-10-20 23:14 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-21 5:37 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 4:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-23 5:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-21 23:05 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-22 12:02 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 3:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 21:46 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-21 18:23 ` Paul Menage
2006-10-21 20:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-21 20:59 ` Paul Menage
2006-10-22 10:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 5:26 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-23 5:54 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 5:43 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-23 6:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-23 6:16 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-10-23 16:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-09 10:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-30 21:26 [RFC] cpuset: Remove " Dinakar Guniguntala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061022231623.70daba00.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox