public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/13] KVM: virtualization infrastructure
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:35:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610232235.29287.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453D2604.5010208@qumranet.com>

On Monday 23 October 2006 22:28, Avi Kivity wrote:

> >> +struct segment_descriptor {
> >> +    u16 limit_low;
> >> +    u16 base_low;
> >> +    u8  base_mid;
> >> +    u8  type : 4;
> >> +    u8  system : 1;
> >> +    u8  dpl : 2;
> >> +    u8  present : 1;
> >> +    u8  limit_high : 4;
> >> +    u8  avl : 1;
> >> +    u8  long_mode : 1;
> >> +    u8  default_op : 1;
> >> +    u8  granularity : 1;
> >> +    u8  base_high;
> >> +} __attribute__((packed));
> >>    
> >
> > Bitfields are generally frowned upon. It's better to define
> > constants for each of these and use a u64.
>
> Any specific reasons?  I find the code much more readable (and
> lowercase) with bitfields.

The strongest reason against bitfields is that they are not
endian-clean. This doesn't apply on a architecture-specific
patch such as KVM, but it just feels wrong to read code
with bit fields in the kernel.

> The structure's size is defined by the hardware (struvt vmcs is just a
> header).  In addition, current_vmcs changes when another guest is
> switched in (it is somewhat like the scheduler's current for the VT
> hardware).

Ok, I see.

> >> +static long kvm_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> >> +                      unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct kvm *kvm = filp->private_data;
> >> +    int r = -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +    switch (ioctl) {
> >> +    default:
> >> +            ;
> >> +    }
> >> +out:
> >> +    return r;
> >> +}
> >>    
> >
> > Huh? Just leave out stuff like this. If the ioctl function is introduced
> > in a later patch, you can still add the whole function there. 
>
> Several different patches add content here, so I thought I wouldn't play
> favorite.
>
> It also makes reordering the patches a little less painful.  Any tips on
> that or is that a normal ramp up?  I'm using quilt for now and syncing
> to a conventional source control repository.

I saw later how you add specific calls to this function. I guess it's
already as good as it gets, so just leave it this way.

	Arnd <><

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-23 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-23 13:28 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine (v2) Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/13] KVM: userspace interface Avi Kivity
2006-10-24 12:51   ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-24 12:56     ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-24 12:59       ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-23 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/13] KVM: Intel virtual mode extensions definitions Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/13] KVM: kvm data structures Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:30 ` [PATCH 4/13] KVM: random accessors and constants Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:30 ` [PATCH 5/13] KVM: virtualization infrastructure Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 19:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-10-23 20:28     ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 20:35       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2006-10-23 20:39         ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-24 12:03         ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-24  5:19           ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-24 13:43             ` [PATCH] x86: Extract segment descriptor definitions for use outside of x86_64 Avi Kivity
2006-10-24 14:10               ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-23 13:30 ` [PATCH 6/13] KVM: memory slot management Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:30 ` [PATCH 7/13] KVM: vcpu creation and maintenance Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:30 ` [PATCH 8/13] KVM: vcpu execution loop Avi Kivity
     [not found]   ` <200610232141.45802.arnd@arndb.de>
2006-10-23 20:16     ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 20:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-10-23 20:37         ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 21:02           ` Antonio Vargas
2006-10-23 21:11             ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 22:08               ` Antonio Vargas
2006-10-23 22:18           ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-10-23 13:31 ` [PATCH 9/13] KVM: define exit handlers Avi Kivity
2006-10-24  1:05   ` Anthony Liguori
2006-10-24  7:23     ` Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:31 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: less common " Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:31 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: mmu Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:31 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: x86 emulator Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:31 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: plumbing Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 13:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine (v2) Avi Kivity
2006-10-23 15:38 ` [PATCH 0/13] KVM: qemu patch Avi Kivity
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-26 17:19 [PATCH 0/13] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine (v3) Avi Kivity
2006-10-26 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/13] KVM: virtualization infrastructure Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200610232235.29287.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox