public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] On demand sched_domain balancing in tasklet
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061024183104.4530.29183.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)

This patchset moves potentially expensive load balancing out of the scheduler
tick (where we run with interrupts disabled) into a tasklet that is triggered
if necessary from scheduler_tick(). Load balancing will then run with interrupts
enabled. This eliminates interrupt holdoff times and avoids potential machine
livelock if f.e. load balancing is performed over a large number of processors
and many of the nodes experience heavy load which may lead to delays in
fetching cachelines. We have currently up to 1024 processors and may go up
to 4096 soon. Similar issues were seen on a Fujitsu system in the past.

The moving of the load balancing into a tasklet also allows some
cleanup in scheduler_tick(). It gets easier to read and the determination
of the state for load balancing can be moved out of scheduler_tick().

Further optimization of scheduler_tick() processing occurs because we
no longer check all the sched domains on each tick.
We determine the time of the next load balancing on every load balancing
and check against this single value in scheduler_tick().

Another optimization is that we perform the staggering of the individual
load balance operations not during load balancing but shift that
to the setup of the sched domains.

For the earlier discussion see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=116119187800002&r=1&w=2

Tested on:
NUMA ia64/sn2
SMP i386
UP x86_64


             reply	other threads:[~2006-10-24 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-24 18:31 Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-10-24 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] Disable interrupts for locking in load_balance() Christoph Lameter
2006-10-24 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] Extract load calculation from rebalance_tick Christoph Lameter
2006-10-26 12:03   ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-26 16:12     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-24 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] Use next_balance instead of last_balance Christoph Lameter
2006-10-26 12:13   ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-26 12:32     ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-26 16:44       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-26 17:13         ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-26 18:17           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-24 18:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] Create rebalance_domains from rebalance_tick Christoph Lameter
2006-10-26 12:19   ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-26 16:19     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-24 18:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] Only call rebalance_domains when needed from scheduler_tick Christoph Lameter
2006-10-26 12:26   ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-26 16:24     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-26 17:12       ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-26 18:13         ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061024183104.4530.29183.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox