Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions

Russell King
2006-10-20T18:32:09Z

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:19:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:07:22 +0100
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > Subject : undefined reference to highest_possible_node_id
> > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/4/233
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/15/11
> > > > Submitter : Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
> > > > Caused-By : Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
> > > > commit 0f532f3861d2c4e5aa7dcd33fb18e9975eb28457
> > > > Status : unknown
> > >
> > > Looking at this commit and the mails, it was known on the 4th September
> > > that this patch caused build errors while this change was in -mm, yet it
> > > still found its way into mainline on 2nd October.
> > >
> > > Is anyone going to look at fixing this problem, or should we be asking
> > > for the commit to be reverted?
> >
> > Since everyone seems intent at ignoring this issue, here's a patch to
> > try to solve it.
>
> I sent the below to Linus yesterday...

Ah, okay. Must not have poped out of the other side of Linus by 6am GMT
then. (We also seem to have non-working git snapshots again, so when I
looked at the ARM kautobuild it showed the same old errors.)

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core