From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated.
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:20:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061025102054.GA4281@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161770873.22729.120.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
On Wed, Oct 25 2006, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 11:17 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25 2006, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > IIRC, I avoided list.h because I only wanted a singly linked list (it
> > > never gets traversed backwards). List.h looks to me like all doubly
> > > linked lists. Do you know if there are any other singly linked list
> > > implementations I could piggy-back?
> >
> > Look closer in list.h, more specifically at the hlist_ entries.
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I did look at it, but unless I'm misreading,
> it's still doubly linked. No matter. I'll use the doubly linked list.
It is, the head just takes up a pointer less. As hch mentioned, I doubt
it matters in this case at all.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-25 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-23 4:14 [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-23 15:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-23 23:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 8:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 8:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:42 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 9:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 9:10 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 10:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 12:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-27 11:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 23:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-31 11:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 20:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:06 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 23:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 9:17 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-25 10:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 10:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-10-31 11:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-11-01 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-01 21:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061025102054.GA4281@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox