From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750734AbWJ0Ufy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:35:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751254AbWJ0Ufy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:35:54 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:6576 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734AbWJ0Ufx (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:35:53 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Lee Revell Subject: Re: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix? Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:35:10 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel , john stultz References: <1161969308.27225.120.camel@mindpipe> In-Reply-To: <1161969308.27225.120.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610271335.10178.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > What are the chances of Linux getting a similar fix? Fix isn't the right word i would use for this particular implementation. -Andi