From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] Extract load calculation from rebalance_tick
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:41:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061028024128.10809.80594.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061028024112.10809.15841.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Extract load calculation from rebalance_tick
A load calculation is always done in rebalance_tick() in addition
to the real load balancing activities that only take place when certain
jiffie counts have been reached. Move that processing into a separate
function and call it directly from scheduler_tick().
Also extract the time slice handling from scheduler_tick and
put it into a separate function. Then we can clean up scheduler_tick
significantly. It will no longer have any gotos.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc3/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc3.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-10-27 13:24:29.354896541 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc3/kernel/sched.c 2006-10-27 13:40:39.256955830 -0500
@@ -2816,27 +2816,10 @@ static void active_load_balance(struct r
spin_unlock(&target_rq->lock);
}
-/*
- * rebalance_tick will get called every timer tick, on every CPU.
- *
- * It checks each scheduling domain to see if it is due to be balanced,
- * and initiates a balancing operation if so.
- *
- * Balancing parameters are set up in arch_init_sched_domains.
- */
-
-/* Don't have all balancing operations going off at once: */
-static inline unsigned long cpu_offset(int cpu)
+static void update_load(struct rq *this_rq)
{
- return jiffies + cpu * HZ / NR_CPUS;
-}
-
-static void
-rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, enum idle_type idle)
-{
- unsigned long this_load, interval, j = cpu_offset(this_cpu);
- struct sched_domain *sd;
int i, scale;
+ unsigned long this_load;
this_load = this_rq->raw_weighted_load;
@@ -2855,6 +2838,28 @@ rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *
new_load += scale-1;
this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) / scale;
}
+}
+
+/*
+ * rebalance_tick will get called every timer tick, on every CPU.
+ *
+ * It checks each scheduling domain to see if it is due to be balanced,
+ * and initiates a balancing operation if so.
+ *
+ * Balancing parameters are set up in arch_init_sched_domains.
+ */
+
+/* Don't have all balancing operations going off at once: */
+static inline unsigned long cpu_offset(int cpu)
+{
+ return jiffies + cpu * HZ / NR_CPUS;
+}
+
+static void
+rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, enum idle_type idle)
+{
+ unsigned long interval, j = cpu_offset(this_cpu);
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
@@ -2886,12 +2891,15 @@ rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *
/*
* on UP we do not need to balance between CPUs:
*/
-static inline void rebalance_tick(int cpu, struct rq *rq, enum idle_type idle)
+static inline void rebalance_tick(int cpu, struct rq *rq)
{
}
static inline void idle_balance(int cpu, struct rq *rq)
{
}
+static inline void update_load(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+}
#endif
static inline int wake_priority_sleeper(struct rq *rq)
@@ -3041,35 +3049,12 @@ void account_steal_time(struct task_stru
cpustat->steal = cputime64_add(cpustat->steal, tmp);
}
-/*
- * This function gets called by the timer code, with HZ frequency.
- * We call it with interrupts disabled.
- *
- * It also gets called by the fork code, when changing the parent's
- * timeslices.
- */
-void scheduler_tick(void)
+static void task_running_tick(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- unsigned long long now = sched_clock();
- struct task_struct *p = current;
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
-
- update_cpu_clock(p, rq, now);
-
- rq->timestamp_last_tick = now;
-
- if (p == rq->idle) {
- if (wake_priority_sleeper(rq))
- goto out;
- rebalance_tick(cpu, rq, SCHED_IDLE);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Task might have expired already, but not scheduled off yet */
if (p->array != rq->active) {
+ /* Task has expired but was not scheduled yet */
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
- goto out;
+ return;
}
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
/*
@@ -3137,8 +3122,35 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
}
out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-out:
- rebalance_tick(cpu, rq, NOT_IDLE);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function gets called by the timer code, with HZ frequency.
+ * We call it with interrupts disabled.
+ *
+ * It also gets called by the fork code, when changing the parent's
+ * timeslices.
+ */
+void scheduler_tick(void)
+{
+ unsigned long long now = sched_clock();
+ struct task_struct *p = current;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ enum idle_type idle = NOT_IDLE;
+
+ update_cpu_clock(p, rq, now);
+
+ rq->timestamp_last_tick = now;
+
+ if (p == rq->idle) {
+ /* Task on the idle queue */
+ if (!wake_priority_sleeper(rq))
+ idle = SCHED_IDLE;
+ } else
+ task_running_tick(rq, p);
+ update_load(rq);
+ rebalance_tick(cpu, rq, idle);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-28 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-28 2:41 [PATCH 0/7] sched_domain balancing via tasklet V2 Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] Avoid taking rq lock in wake_priority_sleeper Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] Disable interrupts for locking in load_balance() Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] Stagger load balancing in build_sched_domains Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] Move idle stat calculation into rebalance_tick() Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 17:57 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-29 1:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] Use tasklet to call balancing Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] Call tasklet less frequently Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-03 20:46 [PATCH 0/7] sched_domain balancing via tasklet V3 Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 20:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] Extract load calculation from rebalance_tick Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061028024128.10809.80594.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox