From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] Stagger load balancing in build_sched_domains
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:41:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061028024133.10809.18860.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061028024112.10809.15841.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Stagger load balancing in build_sched_domains
Instead of dealing with the staggering of load balancing
during actual load balancing we just do it once when the sched domains
set up.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc3/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc3.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-10-27 15:35:40.221104772 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc3/kernel/sched.c 2006-10-27 15:37:36.526511796 -0500
@@ -2848,17 +2848,10 @@ static void update_load(struct rq *this_
*
* Balancing parameters are set up in arch_init_sched_domains.
*/
-
-/* Don't have all balancing operations going off at once: */
-static inline unsigned long cpu_offset(int cpu)
-{
- return jiffies + cpu * HZ / NR_CPUS;
-}
-
static void
rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, enum idle_type idle)
{
- unsigned long interval, j = cpu_offset(this_cpu);
+ unsigned long interval;
struct sched_domain *sd;
for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
@@ -2874,7 +2867,7 @@ rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *
if (unlikely(!interval))
interval = 1;
- if (j - sd->last_balance >= interval) {
+ if (jiffies - sd->last_balance >= interval) {
if (load_balance(this_cpu, this_rq, sd, idle)) {
/*
* We've pulled tasks over so either we're no
@@ -6327,6 +6320,16 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int
}
/*
+ * Calculate jiffies start to use for each cpu. On sched domain
+ * initialization this jiffy value is used to stagger the load balancing
+ * of the cpus so that they do not load balance all at at the same time.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long cpu_offset(int cpu)
+{
+ return jiffies + cpu * HZ / NR_CPUS;
+}
+
+/*
* Build sched domains for a given set of cpus and attach the sched domains
* to the individual cpus
*/
@@ -6382,6 +6385,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const cpu
sd->span = *cpu_map;
group = cpu_to_allnodes_group(i, cpu_map);
sd->groups = &sched_group_allnodes[group];
+ sd->last_balance = cpu_offset(i);
p = sd;
} else
p = NULL;
@@ -6390,6 +6394,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const cpu
*sd = SD_NODE_INIT;
sd->span = sched_domain_node_span(cpu_to_node(i));
sd->parent = p;
+ sd->last_balance = cpu_offset(i);
if (p)
p->child = sd;
cpus_and(sd->span, sd->span, *cpu_map);
@@ -6401,6 +6406,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const cpu
*sd = SD_CPU_INIT;
sd->span = nodemask;
sd->parent = p;
+ sd->last_balance = cpu_offset(i);
if (p)
p->child = sd;
sd->groups = &sched_group_phys[group];
@@ -6413,6 +6419,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const cpu
sd->span = cpu_coregroup_map(i);
cpus_and(sd->span, sd->span, *cpu_map);
sd->parent = p;
+ sd->last_balance = cpu_offset(i);
p->child = sd;
sd->groups = &sched_group_core[group];
#endif
@@ -6425,6 +6432,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const cpu
sd->span = cpu_sibling_map[i];
cpus_and(sd->span, sd->span, *cpu_map);
sd->parent = p;
+ sd->last_balance = cpu_offset(i);
p->child = sd;
sd->groups = &sched_group_cpus[group];
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-28 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-28 2:41 [PATCH 0/7] sched_domain balancing via tasklet V2 Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] Avoid taking rq lock in wake_priority_sleeper Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] Disable interrupts for locking in load_balance() Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] Extract load calculation from rebalance_tick Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] Move idle stat calculation into rebalance_tick() Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 17:57 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-29 1:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] Use tasklet to call balancing Christoph Lameter
2006-10-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] Call tasklet less frequently Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-03 20:46 [PATCH 0/7] sched_domain balancing via tasklet V3 Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 20:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] Stagger load balancing in build_sched_domains Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061028024133.10809.18860.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox