public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Ben Collins <bcollins@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pallipadi@pressure.kernelslacker.org,
	Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: p4-clockmod N60 errata workaround.
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:54:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061028195443.GB8282@redhat.com> (raw)

Ben,
 For the best part of a year since that N60 errata workaround
went in, I've had floods of complaints from users of that driver
about this driver becoming even more useless than it was before
"I had 8 frequencies, now I have 2" being the common complaint.
which was to be expected given that the intention of the errata
workaround was to cripple frequencies <2GHz.

The point worth noting however, is that none of these users ever
noticed any problems when we didn't have the workaround in place,
so they were somewhat miffed when it stopped working.

The actual errata states..

"If a system de-asserts STPCLK# at a 12.5% duty cycle, the processor
 is running below 2 GHz, and the processor thermal control circuit (TCC)
 on-demand clock modulation is active, the processor may hang.
 This erratum does not occur under the automatic mode of the TCC."

I believe the reason we never saw any problems is that we _are_ using
the TCC by default.  See the code in arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c
intel_init_thermal() and friends.

So my current feeling is that we're working around an errata that
can never happen, and crippling functionality in the process for
no good reason.  I'm leaning towards just removing this workaround.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

             reply	other threads:[~2006-10-28 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-28 19:54 Dave Jones [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-28 19:53 p4-clockmod N60 errata workaround Dave Jones
     [not found] ` <598fb2280702150837h33b73f3u2c5efe7838f7d420@mail.gmail.com>
2007-02-15 16:56   ` Ben Collins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061028195443.GB8282@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=Pallipadi@pressure.kernelslacker.org \
    --cc=bcollins@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox