From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI Error Recovery: Symbios SCSI device driver
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:26:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061031222631.GQ6360@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162322643.13859.54.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:24:01PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> Just for my own edification, what happens on the dual function (dual
> channel) boards? We have two threads there and two separate I/O
> processors. I assume a PCI error will kill both,
Yes.
> do we need to do
> something about this?
I'm not sure, and actually, I have not thought about
or tested this case for the symbios.
The answer depends on the h/w design. On PCI
multi-function cards, the PCI reset callbacks will
get called for each PCI function. (Each function
gets to vote/veto how it wants te reset to proceed).
If the hardware supports completely independent scsi
host initialization for each scsi i/o processor,
then things should just work.
If some part of the card init sequence needs to run
only once, even when there are two i/o processors, then
this needs to be protected against. I presume that
using if(0 == PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn)) is enough to
make sure the hardware initilization is called only once
for the card -- i.e. by calling it only for PCI
function zero. If there needs to be some additional
locking to make sure that the card initialization
completes before the i/o processor initialization
starts ... well, I don't know about that.
--linas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-31 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-20 18:05 [PATCH]: PCI Error Recovery: Symbios SCSI device driver Linas Vepstas
2006-10-31 18:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-31 19:24 ` James Bottomley
2006-10-31 22:26 ` Linas Vepstas [this message]
2006-10-31 23:13 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-11-02 0:07 ` [PATCH v3]: " Linas Vepstas
2006-11-02 1:19 ` [PATCH v4]: " Linas Vepstas
2006-11-02 3:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-02 4:46 ` [PATCH]: " Grant Grundler
2006-11-02 4:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-02 18:39 Linas Vepstas
2007-07-05 18:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-05 18:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-02 22:53 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-21 23:13 Linas Vepstas
2006-09-22 22:06 ` Luca
2006-09-22 23:32 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-22 23:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-09-22 23:50 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-23 0:57 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061031222631.GQ6360@austin.ibm.com \
--to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox