From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992787AbWKATzN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:55:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992789AbWKATzN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:55:13 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:48518 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992787AbWKATzL (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:55:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:54:58 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Pavel Machek , LKML , Nigel Cunningham , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] swsusp: Freeze filesystems during suspend (rev. 2) Message-Id: <20061101115458.bb02f1d3.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200611011853.09633.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200611011200.18438.rjw@sisk.pl> <20061101114707.GA22079@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200611011853.09633.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:53:07 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > +void freeze_filesystems(void) > +{ > + struct super_block *sb; > + > + lockdep_off(); > + /* > + * Freeze in reverse order so filesystems dependant upon others are > + * frozen in the right order (eg. loopback on ext3). > + */ > + list_for_each_entry_reverse(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) { > + if (!sb->s_root || !sb->s_bdev || > + (sb->s_frozen == SB_FREEZE_TRANS) || > + (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) || > + (sb->s_flags & MS_FROZEN)) > + continue; > + > + freeze_bdev(sb->s_bdev); > + sb->s_flags |= MS_FROZEN; > + } > + lockdep_on(); > +} > + > +/** > + * thaw_filesystems - unlock all filesystems > + */ > +void thaw_filesystems(void) > +{ > + struct super_block *sb; > + > + lockdep_off(); > + > + list_for_each_entry(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) > + if (sb->s_flags & MS_FROZEN) { > + sb->s_flags &= ~MS_FROZEN; > + thaw_bdev(sb->s_bdev, sb); > + } > + > + lockdep_on(); > +} argh. The uncommented, unchangelogged lockdep_off() calls are completely mysterious right now, even before the patch is merged. They will not become less mysterious over time. Please, take pity upon the readers of your code. Add a comment.