From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Avoid allocating during interleave from almost full nodes
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:42:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061103174206.53f2c49e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061103172605.e646352a.pj@sgi.com>
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:26:05 -0800
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > But in this application which you are proposing, any correlation with
> > elapsed walltime is very slight. It's just the wrong baseline to use.
> > What is the *sense* in it?
>
> Ah - but time is cheap as dirt, and scales like the common cold virus.
> That makes it sinfully attractive for secondary affect placement cache
> hints like this.
>
> What else would you suggest?
>
> Same question applies, I suppose, to my zonelist caching patch that is
> sitting in your *-mm patch stack, where you also had doubts about using
> wall clock time to decay the fullnode hints.
Depends what it's doing. "number of pages allocated" would be a good
"clock" to use in the VM. Or pages scanned. Or per-cpu-pages reloads.
Something which adjusts to what's going on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-04 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-03 20:58 Avoid allocating during interleave from almost full nodes Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-03 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-04 0:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 0:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 16:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 20:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 20:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 1:26 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-04 1:42 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-11-04 10:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-06 16:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-08 10:21 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-08 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-08 17:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-08 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-08 17:21 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-08 17:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-12-01 7:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-12-01 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-01 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 10:35 ` CTL_UNNUMBERED and killing sys_sysctl Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061103174206.53f2c49e.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox