From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932096AbWKCUqp (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:46:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753529AbWKCUqp (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:46:45 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:48594 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753528AbWKCUqo (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:46:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:46:41 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <20061103204641.15739.87085.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20061103204636.15739.74831.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> References: <20061103204636.15739.74831.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Avoid taking rq lock in wake_priority_sleeper Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Avoid taking the rq lock in wake_priority sleeper Avoid taking the request queue lock in wake_priority_sleeper if there are no running processes. Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4-mm2/kernel/sched.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.19-rc4-mm2.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-11-02 17:31:05.964060772 -0600 +++ linux-2.6.19-rc4-mm2/kernel/sched.c 2006-11-03 12:51:15.281805162 -0600 @@ -2899,6 +2899,9 @@ static inline int wake_priority_sleeper( int ret = 0; #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT + if (!rq->nr_running) + return 0; + spin_lock(&rq->lock); /* * If an SMT sibling task has been put to sleep for priority