From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Brent Baccala <cosine@freesoft.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:15:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061105121522.GC13555@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611031214560.28100@debian.freesoft.org>
On Fri, Nov 03 2006, Brent Baccala wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >Try to time it (visual output of the app is not very telling, and it's
> >buffered) and then apply some profiling.
>
> OK, a little more info. I added gettimeofday() calls after each call
> to io_submit(), put the timevals in an array, and after everything was
> done computed the difference between each timeval and the program start
> time, as well as the deltas. I got this:
>
> 0: 0.080s
> 1: 0.086s 0.006s
> 2: 0.102s 0.016s
> 3: 0.111s 0.008s
> 4: 0.118s 0.007s
> 5: 0.134s 0.015s
> 6: 0.141s 0.006s
> 7: 0.148s 0.006s
> 8: 0.158s 0.009s
> 9: 0.164s 0.006s
> ...
> 96: 1.036s 0.007s
> 97: 1.044s 0.007s
> 98: 1.147s 0.102s
> 99: 1.155s 0.008s
>
> 98 appears to be an aberration. Perhaps three of the times on an
> average run are around a tenth of a second; all of the others are
> pretty steady at 7 or 8 microseconds. So, it's basically linear in
> its time consumption.
>
> Does 7 microseconds seem a bit excessive for an io_submit (and a
> gettimeofday)?
I guess you mean miliseconds, not microseconds. 7 miliseconds seems way
too long. I repeated your test here, and the 100 submits take 97000
microseconds here - or 97 miliseconds. So that's a little less than 1
msec per io_submit. Still pretty big. You can experiment with oprofile
to profile where the kernel spends its time in that period.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-05 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-03 8:23 async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15 Brent Baccala
2006-11-03 12:20 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-03 15:58 ` Brent Baccala
2006-11-03 16:02 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-03 17:09 ` Brent Baccala
2006-11-03 17:30 ` Brent Baccala
2006-11-05 12:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-11-06 6:42 ` Brent Baccala
2006-11-06 10:43 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-06 15:52 ` Phillip Susi
2006-11-06 16:02 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-06 17:04 ` Phillip Susi
2006-11-06 17:10 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-06 21:22 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-07 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-07 21:02 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-11-10 9:24 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-07 0:03 Brent Baccala
2006-11-07 0:24 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-07 7:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061105121522.GC13555@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=cosine@freesoft.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox