From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: caglar@pardus.org.tr
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Opps] Invalid opcode
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:57:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611051957.45260.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611051917.56971.caglar@pardus.org.tr>
On Sunday 05 November 2006 18:17, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> 05 Kas 2006 Paz 18:40 tarihinde, Andi Kleen şunları yazmıştı:
> > How do you know this?
>
> Just guessing, if im not wrong panics occur after SMP alternative switching
> code done its job.
Can you test with "noreplacement" to make sure?
Anyways I suspect we're just getting back some variant of the old CPU setup race.
Normally CPU booting in Linux follows a special "cpu hotplug" state machine,
but for historical reasons i386 only implements one state of this. At one
point we had a similar bug (but not in the callback on CPU #0, but in
the timer on newly booted CPU). I don't see currently how it can happen
(but i haven't thought very deeply about it yet)
Probably your timing is just unlucky on those simulators.
Previously we avoided converting i386 cpu bootup fully to the new state
machine because it is very fragile, but it's possible that there
is no other choice than to do it properly. Or maybe another kludge
is possible.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-05 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-05 13:07 [Opps] Invalid opcode S.Çağlar Onur
2006-11-05 16:40 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-05 17:17 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-11-05 17:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-05 17:38 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-11-05 18:57 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-11-05 19:51 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-11-05 23:13 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-11-05 23:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-30 6:44 ` Fix for OpenSUSE kernel bug (was Re: [Opps] Invalid opcode) Zachary Amsden
2006-11-30 14:21 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-11-12 2:39 ` [Opps] Invalid opcode S.Çağlar Onur
2006-11-12 3:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 4:20 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-11-13 5:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-15 16:08 ` S.Çağlar Onur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611051957.45260.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kraxel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox