From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make last_inode counter in new_inode 32-bit on kernels that offer x86 compatability
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:04:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061107170454.GA15629@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162914966.28425.24.camel@dantu.rdu.redhat.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 725 bytes --]
On Tue, 7 November 2006 10:56:06 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> Here's a more involved (again, untested) patch. I turned new_inode into
> a wrapper for a new function (new_inode_autonum). If the autonum arg is
> set, then we should get back a unique i_ino.
A good start. You didn't convert any callers yet, so I did a quick
poll. Turned out that out of 76 callers 37 explicitly set i_ino, 1
(fat) calls iunique itself and 38 look at first glance as if they
didn't set i_ino. xfs and jfs were in the latter category, which just
proved I didn't look too closely.
Anyway, the distribution is fairly even, so I agree with your choice
of default behaviour.
Jörn
--
Schrödinger's cat is <BLINK>not</BLINK> dead.
-- Illiad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-07 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-06 18:12 [PATCH] make last_inode counter in new_inode 32-bit on kernels that offer x86 compatability Jeff Layton
2006-11-06 18:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-06 18:31 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-06 18:47 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-06 20:23 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-06 20:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-06 20:56 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-06 20:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-06 21:11 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-06 21:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-06 22:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-11-07 15:56 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-07 16:07 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-07 16:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-07 17:04 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2006-11-07 17:28 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-07 17:42 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-07 17:53 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-11-07 18:07 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-07 17:56 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-07 18:01 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-07 18:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-07 19:41 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-07 20:41 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-07 21:13 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-07 21:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-07 22:09 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-07 18:01 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-07 18:14 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-07 18:23 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061107170454.GA15629@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--to=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox