From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
ak@suse.de, shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
discuss@x86-64.org, ashok.raj@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] introduce the mechanism of disabling cpu hotplug control
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:23:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061107212332.A6418@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061107203504.b8e17ea8.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:35:04PM -0800
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:35:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:01:34 -0800
> "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > I wanted to add something like disable_cpu_hotplug
>
> My point is, `enable_cpu_hotplug' is nicer
Yep. I got it and hence my "will clean this up" assurance :)
This is all coming from the `no_control' member in cpu structure and I will
change that to something like `hotpluggable'. That will make the patch slightly
big but def clean.
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-08 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-08 1:33 [patch 0/4] i386, x86_64: fix the irqbalance quirk for E7520/E7320/E7525 Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-08 1:36 ` [patch 1/4] add write_pci_config_byte() to direct PCI access routines Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-08 1:40 ` [patch 2/4] introduce the mechanism of disabling cpu hotplug control Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-08 1:43 ` [patch 3/4] x86_64: add genapic_force Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-08 1:46 ` [patch 4/4] fix the irqbalance quirk for E7320/E7520/E7525 Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-08 3:54 ` [patch 2/4] introduce the mechanism of disabling cpu hotplug control Andrew Morton
2006-11-08 4:01 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-08 4:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-08 5:23 ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2006-11-11 0:43 ` [patch] change the 'no_control' field to 'hotpluggable' in the struct cpu Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-08 4:07 ` [patch 0/4] i386, x86_64: fix the irqbalance quirk for E7520/E7320/E7525 Andrew Morton
2006-11-08 4:06 ` Siddha, Suresh B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061107212332.A6418@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox