From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, Wilco Beekhuizen <wilcobeekhuizen@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VIA IRQ quirk missing PCI ids since 2.6.16.17
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:22:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061108202218.8f542fbf.vsu@altlinux.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162847625.10086.36.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6350 bytes --]
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:13:45 +0000 Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-11-06 am 12:47 +0000, ysgrifennodd Sergio Monteiro Basto:
> > this is the latest patch
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18/2.6.18-mm1/broken-out/via-irq-quirk-behaviour-change.patch
> > about this issue please try it and report the experience :)
>
> There are several minor problems with this patch:
>
> - V-Link which is what we are dealing with is only found in the VIA 8233
> and later devices and early stuff should not be touched
> - It whacks external devices
>
> I think something like this (untested) would be better
>
> diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/quirks.c linux-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2006-10-31 21:11:49.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2006-11-06 20:39:03.026705152 +0000
> @@ -641,48 +641,42 @@
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_3, quirk_via_acpi );
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_4, quirk_via_acpi );
>
> -/*
> - * Via 686A/B: The PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register for the on-chip
> - * devices, USB0/1, AC97, MC97, and ACPI, has an unusual feature:
> - * when written, it makes an internal connection to the PIC.
> - * For these devices, this register is defined to be 4 bits wide.
> - * Normally this is fine. However for IO-APIC motherboards, or
> - * non-x86 architectures (yes Via exists on PPC among other places),
> - * we must mask the PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE value versus 0xf to get
> - * interrupts delivered properly.
> - *
> - * Some of the on-chip devices are actually '586 devices' so they are
> - * listed here.
> - */
> -
> -static int via_irq_fixup_needed = -1;
>
> /*
> - * As some VIA hardware is available in PCI-card form, we need to restrict
> - * this quirk to VIA PCI hardware built onto VIA-based motherboards only.
> - * We try to locate a VIA southbridge before deciding whether the quirk
> - * should be applied.
> - */
> -static const struct pci_device_id via_irq_fixup_tbl[] = {
> - {
> - .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA,
> - .device = PCI_ANY_ID,
> - .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID,
> - .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID,
> - .class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA << 8,
> - .class_mask = 0xffff00,
> - },
> + * VIA bridges which have VLink
> + */
> +
> +static const struct pci_device_id via_vlink_fixup_tbl[] = {
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233_0), 17},
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233A), 17 },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233C_0), 17 },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235), 16 },
Hmm, the old comment mentions 686A/B explicitly - seems that these old
chips also use PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE to control interrupt routing. Is it
correct to ignore them here? Yes, that chips used PCI and not VLink,
but they also had an internal PIC (and even internal IO-APIC).
Unfortunately, I no longer have such hardware available.
> + /* May not be needed for the 8237 */
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237), 15 },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A), 15 },
8237 definitely uses PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE to control interrupt routing in
PIC mode - tested with the audio part by writing bogus values with
setpci and checking whether interrupts are delivered.
> { 0, },
> };
>
> -static void quirk_via_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +/**
> + * quirk_via_vlink - VIA VLink IRQ number update
> + * @dev: PCI device
> + *
> + * If the device we are dealing with is on a PIC IRQ we need to
> + * ensure that the IRQ line register which usually is not relevant
> + * for PCI cards, is actually written so that interrupts get sent
> + * to the right place
> + */
> +
> +static void quirk_via_vlink(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> + static struct pci_device_id *via_vlink_fixup = NULL;
> u8 irq, new_irq;
>
> - if (via_irq_fixup_needed == -1)
> - via_irq_fixup_needed = pci_dev_present(via_irq_fixup_tbl);
> -
> - if (!via_irq_fixup_needed)
> + /* Check if we have VLink and cache the result */
> +
> + if (via_vlink_fixup == NULL)
> + via_vlink_fixup = pci_find_present(via_irq_fixup_tbl);
> + if (via_vlink_fixup == NULL)
> return;
If there is no VIA ISA bridge in the system, this won't cache anything.
>
> new_irq = dev->irq;
> @@ -691,9 +685,17 @@
> if (!new_irq || new_irq > 15)
> return;
>
> + /* Internal device ? */
> + if (pdev->bus->number != 0 || PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) > 18 ||
> + PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) < via_vlink_fixup->driver_data)
> + return;
> +
> + /* This is an internal VLink device on a PIC interrupt. The BIOS
> + ought to have set this but may not have, so we redo it */
> +
> pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &irq);
> if (new_irq != irq) {
> - printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: VIA IRQ fixup for %s, from %d to %d\n",
> + printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: VIA VLink IRQ fixup for %s, from %d to %d\n",
> pci_name(dev), irq, new_irq);
> udelay(15); /* unknown if delay really needed */
> pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, new_irq);
> diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/search.c linux-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/search.c
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/search.c 2006-10-31 21:11:31.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc4-mm1/drivers/pci/search.c 2006-11-06 20:30:55.548813056 +0000
> @@ -413,30 +413,17 @@
> return dev;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * pci_dev_present - Returns 1 if device matching the device list is present, 0 if not.
> - * @ids: A pointer to a null terminated list of struct pci_device_id structures
> - * that describe the type of PCI device the caller is trying to find.
> - *
> - * Obvious fact: You do not have a reference to any device that might be found
> - * by this function, so if that device is removed from the system right after
> - * this function is finished, the value will be stale. Use this function to
> - * find devices that are usually built into a system, or for a general hint as
> - * to if another device happens to be present at this specific moment in time.
> - */
> -int pci_dev_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids)
> +struct pci_device_id *pci_find_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids)
New API without proper refcounting? Ewww.
[...]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-08 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-06 11:38 VIA IRQ quirk missing PCI ids since 2.6.16.17 Wilco Beekhuizen
2006-11-06 12:47 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-11-06 21:13 ` Alan Cox
2006-11-07 1:25 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-07 1:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-11-08 8:54 ` Wilco Beekhuizen
2006-11-08 12:43 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-11-08 14:55 ` Wilco Beekhuizen
2006-11-08 15:19 ` Alan Cox
2006-11-07 4:07 ` Greg KH
2006-11-07 8:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-08 17:22 ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2006-11-08 18:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-11-08 20:33 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-11-06 13:30 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061108202218.8f542fbf.vsu@altlinux.ru \
--to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=wilcobeekhuizen@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox