* 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
@ 2006-11-08 12:44 Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-09 6:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-09 8:17 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Nicolas @ 2006-11-08 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
without success.
Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in
http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
Olivier
System: ASUS M2N32-SLI, AMD64 X2 Dual Core 4600
kernel 2.6.9-rc5
irq 22: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80259055>] __report_bad_irq+0x35/0x90
[<ffffffff802592d3>] note_interrupt+0x223/0x280
[<ffffffff80259d41>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb1/0xf0
[<ffffffff8020b17c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffff8020d1ba>] do_IRQ+0x8a/0xe0
[<ffffffff8020a571>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
<EOI>
handlers:
[<ffffffff8807f150>] (nv_generic_interrupt+0x0/0xc0 [sata_nv])
Disabling IRQ #22
CPU0 CPU1
0: 223 45540 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 1 402 IO-APIC-edge i8042
6: 1 4 IO-APIC-edge floppy
8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 0 103 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 7 140 IO-APIC-edge ide0
16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
17: 0 10 IO-APIC-fasteoi bttv0
20: 0 20 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1
21: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
22: 214 99786 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, HDA Intel
23: 76 6230 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, ohci_hcd:usb2
308: 5 3169 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
309: 0 10 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
310: 0 44 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
311: 1 3193 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
312: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
313: 0 1 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
NMI: 64 68
LOC: 45716 45691
ERR: 0
kernel 2.6.19-rc5 with pci=routeirq
irq 21: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80259055>] __report_bad_irq+0x35/0x90
[<ffffffff802592d3>] note_interrupt+0x223/0x280
[<ffffffff80259d41>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb1/0xf0
[<ffffffff8020b17c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffff8020d1ba>] do_IRQ+0x8a/0xe0
[<ffffffff802092f0>] default_idle+0x0/0x50
[<ffffffff8020a571>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
<EOI> [<ffffffff80209319>] default_idle+0x29/0x50
[<ffffffff8020939b>] cpu_idle+0x5b/0x80
[<ffffffff8050039c>] start_secondary+0x50c/0x520
handlers:
[<ffffffff880e6fd0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60 [usbcore])
Disabling IRQ #21
CPU0 CPU1
0: 214 24856 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 0 359 IO-APIC-edge i8042
6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy
8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 0 103 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 0 128 IO-APIC-edge ide0
16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
17: 1 2 IO-APIC-fasteoi bttv0
20: 22 6469 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
21: 11 99989 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
22: 0 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, ohci_hcd:usb1
23: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
308: 8 2378 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
309: 0 9 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
310: 0 9 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
311: 4 2401 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
312: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
313: 0 1 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
NMI: 74 47
LOC: 25024 24991
ERR: 0
kernel 2.6.19-rc5 with irqpoll
Hang during boot
(See screenshot in http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz)
kernel 2.6.18 (works without any problem)
CPU0 CPU1
0: 1590 998089 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 2 657 IO-APIC-edge i8042
6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy
8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
12: 194 59353 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 13 6381 IO-APIC-edge ide0
50: 0 0 IO-APIC-level libata
58: 0 0 IO-APIC-level libata
66: 109 181425 IO-APIC-level libata, nvidia
74: 41 963 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd:usb1, HDA Intel
82: 4 6 IO-APIC-level bttv0
90: 0 0 PCI-MSI-X eth0
98: 3 0 PCI-MSI-X eth0
106: 212234 0 PCI-MSI-X eth0
114: 532 0 PCI-MSI-X eth1
122: 445 0 PCI-MSI-X eth1
130: 212217 0 PCI-MSI-X eth1
233: 73 23009 IO-APIC-level libata, ohci_hcd:usb2
NMI: 99 104
LOC: 999684 999664
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-08 12:44 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared Olivier Nicolas
@ 2006-11-09 6:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-09 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
` (2 more replies)
2006-11-09 8:17 ` Len Brown
1 sibling, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-11-09 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olivier Nicolas, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela
Cc: linux-kernel, alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown,
linux-acpi, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Olivier,
> 2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
> without success.
>
> Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in
> http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
thanks for your report!
I might be wrong, but looking at the dmesg:
- irq 22 is the hda_intel IRQ
- the "irq 22: nobody cared" is immediately before the
"hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI..."
- in the routeirq case, the hda_intel IRQ as well as the
IRQ in the error message change to 21
So it might be related to the hda_intel MSI check.
If this was a wrong guess, other interesting messages in the dmesg are:
<-- snip -->
...
PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000
PCI: No mmconfig possible on device 00:18
...
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:03.0 to 64
pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[02fd:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS
assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:03.0:pcie00]
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:03.0:pcie03]
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:04.0 to 64
pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[02fb:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS
assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:04.0:pcie00]
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:04.0:pcie03]
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:12.0 to 64
pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[0376:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS
assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:12.0:pcie00]
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:12.0:pcie03]
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:14.0 to 64
pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[0374:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS
assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:14.0:pcie00]
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:14.0:pcie03]
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:16.0 to 64
pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[0375:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS
assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:16.0:pcie00]
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:16.0:pcie03]
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:17.0 to 64
pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[0377:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS
assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:17.0:pcie00]
Allocate Port Service[0000:00:17.0:pcie03]
...
<-- snip -->
> Olivier
>
> System: ASUS M2N32-SLI, AMD64 X2 Dual Core 4600
>
>
> kernel 2.6.9-rc5
>
> irq 22: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff80259055>] __report_bad_irq+0x35/0x90
> [<ffffffff802592d3>] note_interrupt+0x223/0x280
> [<ffffffff80259d41>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb1/0xf0
> [<ffffffff8020b17c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
> [<ffffffff8020d1ba>] do_IRQ+0x8a/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8020a571>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
> <EOI>
> handlers:
> [<ffffffff8807f150>] (nv_generic_interrupt+0x0/0xc0 [sata_nv])
> Disabling IRQ #22
>
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 223 45540 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 1 402 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 6: 1 4 IO-APIC-edge floppy
> 8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> 12: 0 103 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 14: 7 140 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> 16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
> 17: 0 10 IO-APIC-fasteoi bttv0
> 20: 0 20 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1
> 21: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
> 22: 214 99786 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, HDA Intel
> 23: 76 6230 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, ohci_hcd:usb2
> 308: 5 3169 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 309: 0 10 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 310: 0 44 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 311: 1 3193 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 312: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 313: 0 1 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> NMI: 64 68
> LOC: 45716 45691
> ERR: 0
>
>
>
> kernel 2.6.19-rc5 with pci=routeirq
>
> irq 21: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff80259055>] __report_bad_irq+0x35/0x90
> [<ffffffff802592d3>] note_interrupt+0x223/0x280
> [<ffffffff80259d41>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb1/0xf0
> [<ffffffff8020b17c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
> [<ffffffff8020d1ba>] do_IRQ+0x8a/0xe0
> [<ffffffff802092f0>] default_idle+0x0/0x50
> [<ffffffff8020a571>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
> <EOI> [<ffffffff80209319>] default_idle+0x29/0x50
> [<ffffffff8020939b>] cpu_idle+0x5b/0x80
> [<ffffffff8050039c>] start_secondary+0x50c/0x520
>
> handlers:
> [<ffffffff880e6fd0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60 [usbcore])
> Disabling IRQ #21
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 214 24856 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 0 359 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy
> 8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> 12: 0 103 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 14: 0 128 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> 16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
> 17: 1 2 IO-APIC-fasteoi bttv0
> 20: 22 6469 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
> 21: 11 99989 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
> 22: 0 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, ohci_hcd:usb1
> 23: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
> 308: 8 2378 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 309: 0 9 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 310: 0 9 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 311: 4 2401 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 312: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 313: 0 1 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> NMI: 74 47
> LOC: 25024 24991
> ERR: 0
>
>
>
> kernel 2.6.19-rc5 with irqpoll
>
> Hang during boot
> (See screenshot in http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz)
>
>
>
> kernel 2.6.18 (works without any problem)
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 1590 998089 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 2 657 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy
> 8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
> 12: 194 59353 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 14: 13 6381 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> 50: 0 0 IO-APIC-level libata
> 58: 0 0 IO-APIC-level libata
> 66: 109 181425 IO-APIC-level libata, nvidia
> 74: 41 963 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd:usb1, HDA Intel
> 82: 4 6 IO-APIC-level bttv0
> 90: 0 0 PCI-MSI-X eth0
> 98: 3 0 PCI-MSI-X eth0
> 106: 212234 0 PCI-MSI-X eth0
> 114: 532 0 PCI-MSI-X eth1
> 122: 445 0 PCI-MSI-X eth1
> 130: 212217 0 PCI-MSI-X eth1
> 233: 73 23009 IO-APIC-level libata, ohci_hcd:usb2
> NMI: 99 104
> LOC: 999684 999664
> ERR: 0
> MIS: 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-09 6:49 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2006-11-09 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-11-09 9:29 ` Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-09 10:38 ` Takashi Iwai
2006-11-09 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2006-11-09 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk
Cc: Olivier Nicolas, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela,
linux-kernel, alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown,
linux-acpi, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
olivier,
lspci -vvxxx please.
it seems usb and audio share the interrtupts by ioapic.
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-09 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
@ 2006-11-09 9:29 ` Olivier Nicolas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Nicolas @ 2006-11-09 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yinghai Lu
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela,
linux-kernel, alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown,
linux-acpi, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> olivier,
>
> lspci -vvxxx please.
>
> it seems usb and audio share the interrtupts by ioapic.
>
> YH
lspci -vvxxx is available at http://olivn.trollprod.org/lspci.gz
2.6.19-rc5 can be booted properly on my system if "notsc" parameter is used.
Could it be related to http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/27/141 as I'm usage
a dual core AMD64 ?
Olivier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-09 6:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-09 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
@ 2006-11-09 10:38 ` Takashi Iwai
2006-11-09 16:08 ` Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-09 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2006-11-09 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk
Cc: Olivier Nicolas, Stephen Hemminger, Jaroslav Kysela, linux-kernel,
alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi,
Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
At Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:49:56 +0100,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> > 2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
> > without success.
> >
> > Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in
> > http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
>
> thanks for your report!
>
> I might be wrong, but looking at the dmesg:
> - irq 22 is the hda_intel IRQ
> - the "irq 22: nobody cared" is immediately before the
> "hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI..."
> - in the routeirq case, the hda_intel IRQ as well as the
> IRQ in the error message change to 21
>
> So it might be related to the hda_intel MSI check.
To disable MSI from the beginning, set disable_msi=1 module option for
snd-hda-intel.
Takashi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-09 10:38 ` Takashi Iwai
@ 2006-11-09 16:08 ` Olivier Nicolas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Nicolas @ 2006-11-09 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Takashi Iwai
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Stephen Hemminger, Jaroslav Kysela, linux-kernel,
alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi,
Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
Takashi,
You are right, setting disable_msi=1 as an option for snd-hda-intel
module solve my problem.
Thanks
Olivier
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:49:56 +0100,
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>> Hi Olivier,
>>
>>> 2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
>>> without success.
>>>
>>> Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in
>>> http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
>> thanks for your report!
>>
>> I might be wrong, but looking at the dmesg:
>> - irq 22 is the hda_intel IRQ
>> - the "irq 22: nobody cared" is immediately before the
>> "hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI..."
>> - in the routeirq case, the hda_intel IRQ as well as the
>> IRQ in the error message change to 21
>>
>> So it might be related to the hda_intel MSI check.
>
> To disable MSI from the beginning, set disable_msi=1 module option for
> snd-hda-intel.
>
>
> Takashi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-09 6:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-09 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-11-09 10:38 ` Takashi Iwai
@ 2006-11-09 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-09 17:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2006-11-09 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk
Cc: Olivier Nicolas, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela, linux-kernel,
alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi,
Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:49:56 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> > 2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
> > without success.
> >
> > Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in
> > http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
>
> thanks for your report!
>
> I might be wrong, but looking at the dmesg:
> - irq 22 is the hda_intel IRQ
> - the "irq 22: nobody cared" is immediately before the
> "hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI..."
> - in the routeirq case, the hda_intel IRQ as well as the
> IRQ in the error message change to 21
>
> So it might be related to the hda_intel MSI check.
More likely the MSI management routines don't work for disabling MSI.
I am debugging a problem where MSI doesn't work across suspend/resume,
I suspect the base MSI code needs fixing.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-09 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2006-11-09 17:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2006-11-09 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Olivier Nicolas, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela,
linux-kernel, alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown,
linux-acpi, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> writes:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:49:56 +0100
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> Hi Olivier,
>>
>> > 2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
>> > without success.
>> >
>> > Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in
>> > http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
>>
>> thanks for your report!
>>
>> I might be wrong, but looking at the dmesg:
>> - irq 22 is the hda_intel IRQ
>> - the "irq 22: nobody cared" is immediately before the
>> "hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI..."
>> - in the routeirq case, the hda_intel IRQ as well as the
>> IRQ in the error message change to 21
>>
>> So it might be related to the hda_intel MSI check.
>
> More likely the MSI management routines don't work for disabling MSI.
Well brand new MSI handling could be buggy, the disable hypothesis doesn't
make much sense on boot up.
> I am debugging a problem where MSI doesn't work across suspend/resume,
> I suspect the base MSI code needs fixing.
Rethinking the interfaces maybe I don't think the code is broken I think
most likely it is just not designed to do the right thing. I remember
thinking how horrible that code is, when I read through it.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-08 12:44 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-09 6:49 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2006-11-09 8:17 ` Len Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2006-11-09 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olivier Nicolas; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 07:44, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
> without success.
Still a problem with pci=nomsi removing all those MSI NICs from the picture?
pci=nommconf is also popular these days:-)
-Len
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
@ 2006-11-09 21:03 Lu, Yinghai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lu, Yinghai @ 2006-11-09 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olivier Nicolas
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela,
linux-kernel, alsa-devel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown,
linux-acpi, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
CPU0 CPU1
0: 214 24856 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 0 359 IO-APIC-edge i8042
6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy
8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 0 103 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 0 128 IO-APIC-edge ide0
16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
17: 1 2 IO-APIC-fasteoi bttv0
20: 22 6469 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
21: 11 99989 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
22: 0 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, ohci_hcd:usb1
23: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
308: 8 2378 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
309: 0 9 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
310: 0 9 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
311: 4 2401 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
312: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
313: 0 1 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
NMI: 74 47
LOC: 25024 24991
ERR: 0
But according to the irq router in pci conf,
the ehci and audio share to use irq 20.
sata0 and ohci use irq 23
sata1 use irq 22, (MAC1 share it but kernel will use MSI)
sata2 use irq 21, (MAC0 share it but kernel will use MSI)
the ACPI report wrong GSI for them?
Can you disable the acpi and check the interrupt and lspci?
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* RE: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
@ 2006-11-10 2:09 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 9:56 ` Olivier Nicolas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lu, Yinghai @ 2006-11-10 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olivier Nicolas, Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela,
linux-kernel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
Eric,
Can you confirm:
>From 2.6.19-rc1, the irq for devices that using io-apic will not change
between pci=routeirq and not.
Olivier,
Can you send lspci -vvxxx for pci=routeirq too?
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-10 2:09 Lu, Yinghai
@ 2006-11-10 9:56 ` Olivier Nicolas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Nicolas @ 2006-11-10 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lu, Yinghai
Cc: Eric W. Biederman, Adrian Bunk, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai,
Jaroslav Kysela, linux-kernel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown,
linux-acpi, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
Lu, Yinghai wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Can you confirm:
> From 2.6.19-rc1, the irq for devices that using io-apic will not change
> between pci=routeirq and not.
>
> Olivier,
> Can you send lspci -vvxxx for pci=routeirq too?
All files are available here http://olivn.trollprod.org/19-rc5/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
@ 2006-11-10 18:20 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 20:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lu, Yinghai @ 2006-11-10 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen, Olivier Nicolas, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela,
linux-kernel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi,
Linus Torvalds
Andi,
The two patches solve the problems that irq nobody care.
They are already in your tree. But first one I wonder if you put correct
one in your tree.
YH
[PATCH] x86_64 irq: reuse vector for __assign_irq_vector
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/26/38
[PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for
destroy_irq
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/28/16
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
2006-11-10 18:20 Lu, Yinghai
@ 2006-11-10 20:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2006-11-10 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lu, Yinghai
Cc: Andi Kleen, Olivier Nicolas, Andrew Morton, Adrian Bunk,
Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela, linux-kernel,
gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi, Linus Torvalds
"Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@amd.com> writes:
> Andi,
>
> The two patches solve the problems that irq nobody care.
>
> They are already in your tree. But first one I wonder if you put correct
> one in your tree.
YH. This is a completely different problem. The irq is properly setup
and received but none of the drivers wanted it.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
@ 2006-11-10 20:16 Lu, Yinghai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lu, Yinghai @ 2006-11-10 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen, Olivier Nicolas, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela,
linux-kernel, gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi,
Linus Torvalds, Lu, Yinghai
That didn't fix the bug.
-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Nicolas [mailto:olivn@trollprod.org]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:03 PM
To: Lu, Yinghai
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
Bad day today,
Kernel compiled with the first parch irq_mcp55.diff
and with the disable_msi option removed.
#options snd-hda-intel disable_msi=1
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ASA2] enabled at IRQ 21
__assign_irq_vector: irq=15, vector=79, domain=000000ff, mask=00000003,
cpu_online_map=00000003
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0d.2[C] -> Link [ASA2] -> GSI 21 (level,
low) -> IRQ 21
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:0d.2 to 64
ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC400 ctl 0xC002 bmdma 0xB400 irq 21
ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xBC00 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xB408 irq 21
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [AAZA] enabled at IRQ 21
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0e.1[B] -> Link [AAZA] -> GSI 21 (level,
low) -> IRQ 21
__assign_irq_vector: irq=139, vector=91, domain=000000ff, mask=00000003,
cpu_online_map=00000003
__assign_irq_vector: irq=139, old_vector=91, domain=000000ff,
mask=00000003, cpu_online_map=00000003
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:0e.1 to 64
irq 21: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff8025a055>] __report_bad_irq+0x35/0x90
[<ffffffff8025a2d3>] note_interrupt+0x223/0x280
[<ffffffff8025ad41>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb1/0xf0
[<ffffffff8020b17c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffff8020d1ba>] do_IRQ+0x8a/0xe0
[<ffffffff802092f0>] default_idle+0x0/0x50
[<ffffffff8020a571>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
<EOI> [<ffffffff80209319>] default_idle+0x29/0x50
[<ffffffff8020939b>] cpu_idle+0x5b/0x80
[<ffffffff8050039c>] start_secondary+0x50c/0x520
handlers:
[<ffffffff8807f150>] (nv_generic_interrupt+0x0/0xc0 [sata_nv])
Disabling IRQ #21
ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:543: hda_intel: No response from codec,
disabling MSI...
So kernl assign irq 21 to sata2, and later share irq 21 with audio.
But audio get MSI, and at that time, it may do sth bad to irq21 that it
is still shared with SATA2.
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared
@ 2006-11-10 20:22 Lu, Yinghai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lu, Yinghai @ 2006-11-10 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ebiederm
Cc: Andi Kleen, Olivier Nicolas, Andrew Morton, Adrian Bunk,
Stephen Hemminger, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela, linux-kernel,
gregkh, linux-pci, len.brown, linux-acpi, Linus Torvalds
-----Original Message-----
From: ebiederm@xmission.com [mailto:ebiederm@xmission.com]
>YH. This is a completely different problem. The irq is properly setup
>and received but none of the drivers wanted it.
The irq with ioapic are shared with sata2 and audio, and later the
audio driver get the irq, and then try to get MSI.
The MAC first shared irq (ioapic) with SATA and it later transfer to use
MSI without problem.
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-10 20:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-08 12:44 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-09 6:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-09 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-11-09 9:29 ` Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-09 10:38 ` Takashi Iwai
2006-11-09 16:08 ` Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-09 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-09 17:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-09 8:17 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-09 21:03 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 2:09 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 9:56 ` Olivier Nicolas
2006-11-10 18:20 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 20:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-10 20:16 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 20:22 Lu, Yinghai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox