From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1424064AbWKIPeJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:34:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1424065AbWKIPeJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:34:09 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44752 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1424064AbWKIPeI (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:34:08 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Alexander van Heukelum Subject: Re: [PATCH] shorten the x86_64 boot setup GDT to what the comment says Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:33:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Steven Rostedt , LKML , sct@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com References: <20061109154436.GA31954@mailshack.com> In-Reply-To: <20061109154436.GA31954@mailshack.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611091433.09232.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Maybe you should consider 16-byte aligning the gdt table too, like > i386 does? It doesn't hurt, and as per the comment in the i386-file > "16 byte aligment is recommended by intel." It already is. -Andi