From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fastboot mailing list <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, "Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Kexec with latest kernel fail
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:11:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061109201118.GB23081@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45538A4E.6040404@sgi.com>
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:06:38PM -0800, Jay Lan wrote:
> Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:07:22PM -0800, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
> >> Eric,
> >>
> >> I got "Invalid memory segment 0x100000 - ..."
> >> using kexec latest kernel...
> >
> > I usually see this when people forget to add the "crashkernel=X@Y" into
> > their /etc/grub.conf kernel command line. Where X and Y are arch
> > specific.
>
> I have had "Invalid memory segment 0x4000000 - 0x4997fff" problem with
> '-l' option _always_. Since my priority was on '-p' i did not spent time
> on debugging this problem yet...
>
> Maybe this "crashkerenl=X@Y" was the cause of my problem? Some platform
> can not specify a location to load so that it is legal to only specify
> "crashkernel=X" now. Is it possible '-l' code path still expect to
> see Y?
>
kexec -l patch does not worry about crashkernel=. Only kexec -p path
does. So this is something else.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-09 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-09 4:07 Kexec with latest kernel fail Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-09 5:48 ` [Fastboot] " Horms
2006-11-09 6:03 ` yhlu
2006-11-09 6:04 ` yhlu
2006-11-09 6:21 ` Horms
2006-11-09 7:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-11-10 0:47 ` Horms
2006-11-09 16:39 ` Don Zickus
2006-11-09 17:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-11-09 20:06 ` Jay Lan
2006-11-09 20:11 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-10 1:12 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 1:27 ` Horms
2006-11-10 1:41 Lu, Yinghai
2006-11-10 5:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-10 7:30 ` yhlu
2006-11-10 9:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-11-10 20:01 Lu, Yinghai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061109201118.GB23081@in.ibm.com \
--to=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai.lu@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox