public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:11:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061109211121.GW4729@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163100115.3138.524.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 08:21:55PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 11:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:52:00 +0100
> > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Do you have the
> > > impression that high quality bug reports on lkml (with this I mean ones
> > > where there is sufficient information, which are not a request for
> > > support and where the reporter actually answers questions that are asked
> > > him) are not getting reasonable attention? 
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > And why does the report quality matter?  
> 
> because it matters where people spend their time. And if you count
> bugreports that are actually distro support questions and then say "but
> these aren't looked at" it's not fair either.
> 
> > If there's insufficient info you
> > just ask for more.
> 
> and that does happen. And half the time people just remain silent :(
> I know I look at a whole bunch of bugreports in areas that I work on. I
> see a lot of other people doing something similar. That doesn't mean
> nothing slips through. I'm sure stuff does slip through. I would HOPE
> it's really obscure things only; but I fear it's also cases where the
> reporter didn't put the right people on the CC as well ;(
>...

There are bad bug reports, but not all bug reports are that bad.

What if the quality of the bug report is good and the submitter is 
responsive, and there's still zero reaction?

Let's make an example:

Since the first list I sent immediately after 2.6.19-rc1 was released, 
kernel Bugzilla #7255 is part of my list of 2.6.19-rc regressions but 
has gotten exactly zero developer responses.

What exactly were the mistakes of the submitter resulting in noone 
caring about Bugzilla #7255?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-09 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-08 22:09 A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 22:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-08 22:40   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 23:05     ` Andreas Mohr
2006-11-08 23:54       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-10 15:15     ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-10 15:48     ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-11-15 21:04       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 22:51   ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09  9:26     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09  9:36       ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09  9:52         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 19:12           ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09 19:21             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 21:11               ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-11-09 21:31                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 23:56                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-11-10  0:18                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-10 17:45                     ` Stefan Richter
2006-11-11 11:00                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-11-08 23:28   ` Diego Calleja
2006-11-09  6:48     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 12:45       ` Rolf Eike Beer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-09  4:57 Al Boldi
2006-11-09 17:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-10 15:52   ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 16:16     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-10 16:42       ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-10 16:53         ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-10 19:33           ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 19:49             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-10 21:22               ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 21:31                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-11  4:15                   ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11  5:09                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-11  7:23                       ` David Miller
2006-11-11 11:15                         ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11  6:31                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-11-11 11:15                       ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11  7:15           ` Willy Tarreau
2006-11-11 12:03             ` Neil Brown
2006-11-11 19:16           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-11-11 19:15         ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061109211121.GW4729@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox