Re: [patch 13/19] GTOD: Mark TSC unusable for highres timers

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Ahoj!

Tahle debata (lkml) by se Vam mohla hodit...
								Pavel

On Fri 2006-11-10 09:10:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 06:10 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > >  		verify_tsc_freq_timer.function = verify_tsc_freq;
> > > >  		verify_tsc_freq_timer.expires =
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hmmm. I wish this patch was unnecessary, but I don't see an easy
> > > solution. 
> > 
> > Very sad. This will make a lot of people unhappy, even to the point
> > where they might prefer disabling noidlehz over super slow gettimeofday. 
> > I assume you at least have a suitable command line option for that, right?
> 
> Yes it is sad. And the sadest part is that AMD and Intel have been asked
> to fix that more than 5 years ago. They did not get their brain straight
> and now we are the dimwits.
> 
> > Can we get a summary on which systems the TSC is considered unstable?
> > Normally we assume if it's stable enough for gettimeofday it should
> > be stable enough for longer delays too.
> 
> TSC is simply a nightmare:
> 
> - Frequency changes with CPU clock
> - Unsynced across CPUs
> - Stops in C3, which makes it completely unusable
> 
> Once you take away periodic interrupts it is simply broken. AMD and
> Intel can run in circels, it does not get better.
> 
> 	tglx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html