From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946681AbWKJOB6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:01:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946670AbWKJOB6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:01:58 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41651 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946673AbWKJOB5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:01:57 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Alexander van Heukelum Subject: Re: [PATCH] shorten the x86_64 boot setup GDT to what the comment says Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:01:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Steven Rostedt , LKML , sct@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com References: <200611091433.09232.ak@suse.de> <20061109183111.GA32438@mailshack.com> In-Reply-To: <20061109183111.GA32438@mailshack.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611101501.40007.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hi Andi, > > (Assuming you mean: "The gdt table already is 16-byte aligned.") > > Hmm. Not in the most recent version of Linus' tree, not even by > concidence, and none of the patches in your quilt-current/patches touch > x86_64's version of setup.S. Am I missing something? The main GDT is. The boot GDT isn't, but it doesn't matter because it is only used for a very short time. -Andi