public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	magnus.damm@gmail.com, lwang@redhat.com, dzickus@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/16] x86_64: Assembly safe page.h and pgtable.h
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:17:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611131817.01066.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061113162827.GC17429@in.ibm.com>

On Monday 13 November 2006 17:28, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> 
> This patch makes pgtable.h and page.h safe to include
> in assembly files like head.S.  Allowing us to use
> symbolic constants instead of hard coded numbers when
> refering to the page tables.

Hmm, I think the ULs are probably not needed anyways. What
happens when you just drop them even for C? You shouldn't get any 
new warnings i hope.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-13 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-13 16:21 [RFC] [PATCH 0/16] x86_64: Relocatable bzImage Support (V2) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:26 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/16] x86_64: Align data segment to page size boundary Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:28 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/16] x86_64: Assembly safe page.h and pgtable.h Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:17   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-11-13 19:27     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 21:16     ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14  1:46       ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-14  2:41         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 16:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH 3/16] x86_64: Kill temp_boot_pmds Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:31 ` [RFC] [PATCH 4/16] x86_64: Clean up the early boot page table Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:33 ` [RFC] [PATCH 5/16] x86_64: Fix earlyprintk to use standard ISA mapping Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:34 ` [RFC] [PATCH 6/16] x86_64: Modify copy_bootdata to to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:35 ` [RFC] [PATCH 7/16] x86_64: cleanup segments Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:40 ` [RFC] [PATCH 8/16] x86_64: Add EFER to the set registers saved by save_processor_state Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:42 ` [RFC] [PATCH 9/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC SMP trampoline Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:28   ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 16:43 ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 17:59     ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 18:13       ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 19:21         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 19:34           ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 19:57             ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 23:01     ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 23:09       ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 21:07     ` [PATCH] x86_64: Move cpu long mode verification code to common file (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 22:54       ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 20:06         ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 16:30   ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 21:36     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-14 21:40       ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-11-14 23:43       ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15  3:49         ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-15 17:26         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-15 18:29           ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 18:38           ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 23:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 23:39       ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 21:24   ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 23:03     ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16  0:28     ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:09       ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:53         ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 21:29           ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 21:51             ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 16:44 ` [RFC] [PATCH 11/16] x86_64: Modify discover_ebda to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:46 ` [RFC] [PATCH 12/16] x86_64: Remove the identity mapping as early as possible Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:47 ` [RFC] [PATCH 13/16] x86_64: __pa and __pa_symbol address space separation Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH 14/16] x86_64: Remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:50 ` [RFC] [PATCH 15/16] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:51 ` [RFC] [PATCH 16/16] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200611131817.01066.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox