From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com, magnus.damm@gmail.com,
lwang@redhat.com, dzickus@redhat.com, pavel@suse.cz,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:34:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061113193447.GB13832@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m14pt3qhjy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:21:05PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
>
> >> This code (verify_cpu) is called while we are still in real mode. So it has
> >> to be present in low 1MB. Now in trampoline has been designed to switch to
> >> 64bit mode and then jump to the kernel hence kernel can be loaded anywhere
> >> even beyond (4G). So if we move this code into say arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S
> >> then we can't even call it.
> >
> > I didn't mean to call it. Just #include it from a common file
>
> I believe the duplication winds up happening in setup.S
>
Yes. So boot cpu code in setup.S is also doing these checks. So one
of the options is that I create a new file says verify_cpu.S and this
code can be shared by setup.S, trampoline.S and wakeup.S.
Or, I can simply drop the verify_cpu bit from trampoline.S and wakeup.S.
This looks like a non-essential bit and in the past we did not perform
these checks in trampoline.S and wakeup.S
At this point of time, I will prefer to go with second option of dropping
extended checks in trampoline.S and wakeup.S to keep things simple.
Does that make sense?
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-13 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-13 16:21 [RFC] [PATCH 0/16] x86_64: Relocatable bzImage Support (V2) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:26 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/16] x86_64: Align data segment to page size boundary Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:28 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/16] x86_64: Assembly safe page.h and pgtable.h Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 19:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 21:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 1:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-14 2:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 16:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH 3/16] x86_64: Kill temp_boot_pmds Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:31 ` [RFC] [PATCH 4/16] x86_64: Clean up the early boot page table Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:33 ` [RFC] [PATCH 5/16] x86_64: Fix earlyprintk to use standard ISA mapping Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:34 ` [RFC] [PATCH 6/16] x86_64: Modify copy_bootdata to to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:35 ` [RFC] [PATCH 7/16] x86_64: cleanup segments Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:40 ` [RFC] [PATCH 8/16] x86_64: Add EFER to the set registers saved by save_processor_state Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:42 ` [RFC] [PATCH 9/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC SMP trampoline Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 16:43 ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 17:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 18:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 19:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 19:34 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2006-11-13 19:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 23:01 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 23:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 21:07 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Move cpu long mode verification code to common file (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 20:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 16:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 21:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-14 21:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-11-14 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 3:49 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-15 17:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-15 18:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 18:38 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 23:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 23:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 21:24 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 23:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 0:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 21:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 21:51 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 16:44 ` [RFC] [PATCH 11/16] x86_64: Modify discover_ebda to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:46 ` [RFC] [PATCH 12/16] x86_64: Remove the identity mapping as early as possible Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:47 ` [RFC] [PATCH 13/16] x86_64: __pa and __pa_symbol address space separation Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH 14/16] x86_64: Remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:50 ` [RFC] [PATCH 15/16] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:51 ` [RFC] [PATCH 16/16] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061113193447.GB13832@in.ibm.com \
--to=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwang@redhat.com \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox