From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, lwang@redhat.com, dzickus@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/16] x86_64: Assembly safe page.h and pgtable.h
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:16:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061113211636.GC13832@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611131817.01066.ak@suse.de>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 06:17:00PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 13 November 2006 17:28, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > This patch makes pgtable.h and page.h safe to include
> > in assembly files like head.S. Allowing us to use
> > symbolic constants instead of hard coded numbers when
> > refering to the page tables.
>
> Hmm, I think the ULs are probably not needed anyways. What
> happens when you just drop them even for C? You shouldn't get any
> new warnings i hope.
>
I think we need these UL suffixes. Otherwise in some cases overflow
can take place and compiler emits warning.
For ex. in following definition I got rid of UL.
#define PGDIR_SIZE (1 << PGDIR_SHIFT)
Here constant defaulted to intger and PGDIR_SHIFT is 39. Hence compiler
emits following warning wherever PGDIR_SIZE is used.
arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c: In function init_level3_page:
arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c:47: warning: left shift count >=
width of type
arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c: In function init_level4_page:
arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c:80: warning: left shift count >=
width of type
arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c:96: warning: left shift count >=
width of type
arch/x86_64/kernel/machine_kexec.c:101: warning: left shift count >=
width of type
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-13 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-13 16:21 [RFC] [PATCH 0/16] x86_64: Relocatable bzImage Support (V2) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:26 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/16] x86_64: Align data segment to page size boundary Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:28 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/16] x86_64: Assembly safe page.h and pgtable.h Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 19:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 21:16 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2006-11-14 1:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-14 2:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 16:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH 3/16] x86_64: Kill temp_boot_pmds Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:31 ` [RFC] [PATCH 4/16] x86_64: Clean up the early boot page table Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:33 ` [RFC] [PATCH 5/16] x86_64: Fix earlyprintk to use standard ISA mapping Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:34 ` [RFC] [PATCH 6/16] x86_64: Modify copy_bootdata to to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:35 ` [RFC] [PATCH 7/16] x86_64: cleanup segments Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:40 ` [RFC] [PATCH 8/16] x86_64: Add EFER to the set registers saved by save_processor_state Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:42 ` [RFC] [PATCH 9/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC SMP trampoline Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 16:43 ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 17:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 18:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 19:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 19:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 19:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 23:01 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 23:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 21:07 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Move cpu long mode verification code to common file (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 20:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 16:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 21:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-14 21:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-11-14 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 3:49 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-15 17:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-15 18:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 18:38 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 23:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 23:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 21:24 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 23:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 0:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 21:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 21:51 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 16:44 ` [RFC] [PATCH 11/16] x86_64: Modify discover_ebda to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:46 ` [RFC] [PATCH 12/16] x86_64: Remove the identity mapping as early as possible Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:47 ` [RFC] [PATCH 13/16] x86_64: __pa and __pa_symbol address space separation Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH 14/16] x86_64: Remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:50 ` [RFC] [PATCH 15/16] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:51 ` [RFC] [PATCH 16/16] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061113211636.GC13832@in.ibm.com \
--to=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwang@redhat.com \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox