public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to cleanly shut down a block device
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:56:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114075648.GK15031@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <455969F2.80401@drzeus.cx>

On Tue, Nov 14 2006, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> I've been trying to sort out some bugs in the MMC layer's block driver,
> but my knowledge about the block layer is severely lacking. So I was
> hoping you could educate me a bit. :)
> 
> Upon creation, the following happens:
> 
> alloc_disk()
> spin_lock_init()
> blk_init_queue()
> blk_queue_*() (Set up limits)
> disk->* = * (assign members)
> blk_queue_hardsect_size()
> set_capacity()
> add_disk()
> 
> And on a clean removal, where there are no users of a card when it is
> removed:
> 
> del_gendisk()
> put_disk()
> blk_cleanup_queue()
> 
> So far everything seems nice and peachy. The question is what to do when
> a card is removed when the device is open.
> 
> In that case, del_gendisk() will be called, which seems to be documented
> as blocking any new requests to be added to the queue. But there will be
> a lot of outstanding requests in the queue.
> 
> Is it up to each block device to iterate and fail these or can I tell
> the kernel "I'm broken, go away!"?
> 
> When the queue eventually drains (without too many oopses) and the user
> calls close(), then put_disk() and blk_cleanup_queue() will be called.

There is no helper to kill already queued requests when a device is
removed, if you look at SCSI you'll see that it handles this "manually"
as well in the request_fn handler. So you'll need a "device dead or
gone" check in your request_fn handler, and do it from there.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-14  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-14  7:02 How to cleanly shut down a block device Pierre Ossman
2006-11-14  7:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-11-14  8:15   ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-14  8:45     ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-14  8:54       ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-14 10:24         ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-14 10:48         ` Russell King
2006-11-14 11:33           ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-14 11:41             ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-14 11:52               ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-14 14:34               ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-14 20:48                 ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-23 21:03                 ` Russell King
2006-11-23 21:19                   ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-14 11:48             ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061114075648.GK15031@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox