From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vatsa@in.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, davej@redhat.com,
mingo@elte.hu, kiran@scalex86.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Define and use new events,CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE.
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:52:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114122214.GC31787@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061114122050.GB31787@in.ibm.com>
This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing
a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug.
The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and
CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent
out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively.
During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is
supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex
in kernel/workqueue.c ).
During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem
is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex.
The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events
like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of
per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow:
- CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems
start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE
etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events.
- CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after
all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED,
CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent
clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs.
This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care
of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to
raw_notifier_call_chain.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
--
include/linux/notifier.h | 2 ++
kernel/cpu.c | 15 +++++++++++----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: hotplug/kernel/cpu.c
===================================================================
--- hotplug.orig/kernel/cpu.c
+++ hotplug/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
return -EINVAL;
+ raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE,
+ (void *)(long)cpu);
err = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
(void *)(long)cpu);
if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) {
@@ -185,6 +187,8 @@ out_thread:
err = kthread_stop(p);
out_allowed:
set_cpus_allowed(current, old_allowed);
+ raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_RELEASE,
+ (void *)(long)cpu);
return err;
}
@@ -206,13 +210,15 @@ int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
/* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret, nr_calls = 0;
void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu))
return -EINVAL;
- ret = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu);
+ raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE, hcpu);
+ ret = __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu,
+ -1, &nr_calls);
if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD) {
printk("%s: attempt to bring up CPU %u failed\n",
__FUNCTION__, cpu);
@@ -233,8 +239,9 @@ static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned in
out_notify:
if (ret != 0)
- raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
- CPU_UP_CANCELED, hcpu);
+ __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
+ CPU_UP_CANCELED, hcpu, nr_calls, NULL);
+ raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_LOCK_RELEASE, hcpu);
return ret;
}
Index: hotplug/include/linux/notifier.h
===================================================================
--- hotplug.orig/include/linux/notifier.h
+++ hotplug/include/linux/notifier.h
@@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ extern int __srcu_notifier_call_chain(st
#define CPU_DOWN_PREPARE 0x0005 /* CPU (unsigned)v going down */
#define CPU_DOWN_FAILED 0x0006 /* CPU (unsigned)v NOT going down */
#define CPU_DEAD 0x0007 /* CPU (unsigned)v dead */
+#define CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE 0x0008 /* Acquire all hotcpu locks */
+#define CPU_LOCK_RELEASE 0x0009 /* Release all hotcpu locks */
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _LINUX_NOTIFIER_H */
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-14 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-14 12:18 [RFC 0/4] Cpu-Hotplug: Use per subsystem hot-cpu mutexes Gautham R Shenoy
2006-11-14 12:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] Extend notifier_call_chain to count nr_calls made Gautham R Shenoy
2006-11-14 12:22 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2006-11-14 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] Eliminate lock_cpu_hotplug in kernel/sched.c Gautham R Shenoy
2006-11-14 12:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] Handle CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE in workqueue_cpu_callback Gautham R Shenoy
2006-11-14 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] Extend notifier_call_chain to count nr_calls made Randy Dunlap
2006-11-15 4:59 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2006-11-15 6:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-15 8:29 ` [PATCH 1-fix/4] Fix extend " Gautham R Shenoy
2006-11-21 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] Extend " Andrew Morton
2006-11-22 6:13 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2006-11-15 0:47 ` [RFC 0/4] Cpu-Hotplug: Use per subsystem hot-cpu mutexes Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061114122214.GC31787@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox