public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: eli@dev.mellanox.co.il
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP packets loss
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:35:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114143531.2ee7eae0@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60157.89.139.64.58.1163542547.squirrel@dev.mellanox.co.il>

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:15:47 +0200 (IST)
eli@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:

> Hi,
> I am running a client/server test app over IPOIB in which the client sends
> a certain amount of data to the server. When the transmittion ends, the
> server prints the bandwidth and how much data it received. I can see that
> the server reports it received about 60% that the client sent. However,
> when I look at the server's interface counters before and after the
> transmittion, I see that it actually received all the data that the client
> sent. This leads me to suspect that the networking layer somehow dropped
> some of the data. One thing to not - the CPU is 100% busy at the receiver.
> Could this be the reason (the machine I am using is 2 dual cores - 4
> CPUs).

If receiver application can't keep up UDP drops packets. The counter
receive buffer errors (UDP_MIB_RCVBUFERRORS) is incremented.

Don't expect flow control or reliable delivery; it's a datagram service!

> The secod question is how do I make the interrupts be srviced by all CPUs?
> I tried through the procfs as described by IRQ-affinity.txt but I can set
> the mask to 0F bu then I read back and see it is indeed 0f but after a few
> seconds I see it back to 02 (which means only CPU1).

Most likely, the user level irq balance daemon (irqbalanced) is adjusting it?

> 
> One more thing - the device I am using is capable of generating MSIX
> interrupts.
> 

Look at device capabilities with:

	lspci -vv


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-14 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-14 22:15 UDP packets loss eli
2006-11-14 22:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-11-14 23:08   ` eli
2006-11-14 23:23     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-15 13:03     ` Neil Horman
2006-11-14 23:14   ` Auke Kok
2006-11-15 21:57     ` John Heffner
2006-11-14 22:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
     [not found] <60157.89.139.64.58.1163542548.squirrel@dev.mellanox.co.il>
2006-11-16 18:51 ` eli
2006-11-16 19:01   ` John Heffner
2006-11-16 21:10     ` eli
2006-11-16 21:23       ` David Miller
2006-11-16 23:52   ` Alan
2006-11-17 14:48   ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061114143531.2ee7eae0@freekitty \
    --to=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=eli@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox