From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: eli@dev.mellanox.co.il
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP packets loss
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:35:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114143531.2ee7eae0@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60157.89.139.64.58.1163542547.squirrel@dev.mellanox.co.il>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:15:47 +0200 (IST)
eli@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running a client/server test app over IPOIB in which the client sends
> a certain amount of data to the server. When the transmittion ends, the
> server prints the bandwidth and how much data it received. I can see that
> the server reports it received about 60% that the client sent. However,
> when I look at the server's interface counters before and after the
> transmittion, I see that it actually received all the data that the client
> sent. This leads me to suspect that the networking layer somehow dropped
> some of the data. One thing to not - the CPU is 100% busy at the receiver.
> Could this be the reason (the machine I am using is 2 dual cores - 4
> CPUs).
If receiver application can't keep up UDP drops packets. The counter
receive buffer errors (UDP_MIB_RCVBUFERRORS) is incremented.
Don't expect flow control or reliable delivery; it's a datagram service!
> The secod question is how do I make the interrupts be srviced by all CPUs?
> I tried through the procfs as described by IRQ-affinity.txt but I can set
> the mask to 0F bu then I read back and see it is indeed 0f but after a few
> seconds I see it back to 02 (which means only CPU1).
Most likely, the user level irq balance daemon (irqbalanced) is adjusting it?
>
> One more thing - the device I am using is capable of generating MSIX
> interrupts.
>
Look at device capabilities with:
lspci -vv
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-14 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-14 22:15 UDP packets loss eli
2006-11-14 22:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-11-14 23:08 ` eli
2006-11-14 23:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-15 13:03 ` Neil Horman
2006-11-14 23:14 ` Auke Kok
2006-11-15 21:57 ` John Heffner
2006-11-14 22:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
[not found] <60157.89.139.64.58.1163542548.squirrel@dev.mellanox.co.il>
2006-11-16 18:51 ` eli
2006-11-16 19:01 ` John Heffner
2006-11-16 21:10 ` eli
2006-11-16 21:23 ` David Miller
2006-11-16 23:52 ` Alan
2006-11-17 14:48 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061114143531.2ee7eae0@freekitty \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=eli@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox