From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Srinivasa DS <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:23:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061116232349.GI11034@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611122343.06625.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:43:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 12 November 2006 23:30, David Chinner wrote:
> > And how does freezing them at that point in time guarantee consistent
> > filesystem state?
>
> If the work queues are frozen, there won't be any fs-related activity _after_
> we create the suspend image.
fs-related activity before or after the suspend image is captured is
not a problem - it's fs-related activity _during_ the suspend that
is an issue here. If we have async I/O completing during the suspend
image capture, we've got problems....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-16 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-07 18:34 [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-07 20:18 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2006-11-07 20:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-07 23:34 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-07 20:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-07 22:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-07 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-08 9:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-01-12 6:23 ` Srinivasa Ds
2007-01-12 10:16 ` Srinivasa Ds
2006-11-07 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-07 23:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-07 23:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-08 0:01 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-08 8:27 ` David Chinner
2006-11-08 14:25 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-08 14:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-08 15:25 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-08 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-07 23:49 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-08 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-08 3:33 ` David Chinner
2006-11-08 2:30 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-08 12:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-08 18:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-09 15:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-09 16:00 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-09 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-09 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-09 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-09 21:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-09 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-09 23:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-09 23:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-09 23:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-10 12:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-12 18:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-12 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-12 23:30 ` David Chinner
2006-11-13 16:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-15 18:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-15 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-15 20:23 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-15 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 23:20 ` David Chinner
2006-11-16 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 7:35 ` Stefan Seyfried
2006-11-10 0:57 ` David Chinner
2006-11-10 10:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-12 22:30 ` David Chinner
2006-11-12 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-13 5:43 ` David Chinner
2006-11-13 16:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-14 0:10 ` David Chinner
2006-11-16 23:23 ` David Chinner [this message]
2006-11-16 23:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-17 1:40 ` David Chinner
2006-11-17 15:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-10 0:54 ` David Chinner
2006-11-10 10:24 ` Alan Cox
2006-11-10 10:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-10 0:33 ` David Chinner
2006-11-10 10:38 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-08 20:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-11-08 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-07 23:23 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-11-07 23:39 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061116232349.GI11034@melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nigel@suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=srinivasa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox