public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian <christiand59@web.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Sluggish system responsiveness on I/O
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:12:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611181412.29144.christiand59@web.de> (raw)

Hello lkml!

Im currently testing 2.6.19-rc5-mm1. Everything works really fine except the 
little wart with bad multimedia interactivity with a kernel compiling in the 
background. So I tried to narrow it down as much 
as possible.

I did several find's,dd's and cats in parrallel and watched four instances of 
glxgears and also played a little enemy-territory. The interactivity was very 
good, in fact no loss of interactivity at all. This was contrary to what I 
believed the whole time. The loss of interactivity has nothing to do with 
heavy I/O. In fact it happens only when I run a task which is I/O and CPU 
heavy at the same time. That means a single kernel compile (with -j1) is able 
to harm interactivity with glxgears and enemy-territory, but fully loading my 
three disks does no harm at all.

So I tried to nice the make and see what happens:

nice 5 make -j4: Seems to make no difference. Heavy stuttering in glxgears and 
et
nice 10 make -j4: Somewhat better but still unusable with et

everything above nice 15 is usable. nice 19 has full interactivity, that means 
you can't make out a difference between no load and kernel compile while 
playing enemy-territory.

I suspect that it has something to do with the priority boost for I/O hogs. 
But if this is a "general" scheduler problem, then why aren't more people 
complaining about this?

-Christian

             reply	other threads:[~2006-11-18 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-18 13:12 Christian [this message]
2006-11-18 13:25 ` Sluggish system responsiveness on I/O Prakash Punnoor
2006-11-18 14:40   ` Christian
2006-11-19  7:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-19 17:44   ` Lee Revell
2006-11-19 18:34     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-22 10:57       ` [rfc patch] " Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200611181412.29144.christiand59@web.de \
    --to=christiand59@web.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox