From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch 2.6.19-rc6 0/6] more rtc framework/driver updates
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:14:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611201014.41980.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
Here are more RTC framework updates, basically for the 2.6.20 queue:
- /proc/driver/rtc update ... display the 'struct rtc_wkalrm' status
bits more sensibly (though the EFI "irq pending" flag is nonsense
with an OS running)
- rtc-sa1100 update ... wasn't reporting "alarm enabled", and its
extra procfs info duplicated information already found there
- X86_PC updates ... create an rtc_cmos platform device when PNPACPI
isn't available do make one through PNP. (Non-PC platforms can do
similar things if they have a "cmos" RTC.)
- Export ACPI RTC extensions through platform_data to the PNP device
or the platform device, as appropriate.
- New "rtc-cmos" driver, for the RTC on most PCs. For most folk this
seems like it should be able to replace drivers/char/rtc.c ...
- Newish "rtc-omap" driver, for the RTC on OMAP1 processors. No point
in having this just live in the OMAP tree.
Folk wanting to try "rtc-cmos" will likely be wanting to tweak their
/dev/rtc node to become a symlink to /dev/rtc0, at least until the
new version of util-linux comes out (with updated "hwclock" knowing
about the new RTC class devices).
- Dave
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-20 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-20 18:14 David Brownell [this message]
2006-11-20 18:17 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 1/6] rtc class /proc/driver/rtc update David Brownell
2006-11-20 23:13 ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-11-21 2:47 ` [Bulk] " David Brownell
2006-11-22 20:37 ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-11-23 0:39 ` David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:19 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 2/6] rtc-sa1100 tweaks David Brownell
2006-11-20 22:48 ` Russell King
2006-11-21 1:46 ` David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:22 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 3/6] X86_PC optionally creates rtc_cmos platform device David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:27 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 5/6] rtc-cmos driver David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:27 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 4/6] ACPI exports RTC extensions through platform_data David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:28 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 6/6] rtc-omap driver David Brownell
2006-11-20 23:09 ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-11-22 1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-22 2:15 ` David Brownell
2006-11-22 2:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-23 0:09 ` David Brownell
2006-11-22 20:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611201014.41980.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox