public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
To: Don Mullis <dwm@meer.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, akpm <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] fault-injection: reject-failure-if-any-caller-lies-within-specified range
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:57:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061120105735.GA9795@APFDCB5C> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163991847.2912.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:04:07PM -0800, Don Mullis wrote:
> /debug/fail_make_request can force a failure like the following:
> 
> 	FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure
...
> 	Buffer I/O error on device hda2, logical block 5782
> 	lost page write due to I/O error on hda2
> 	Aborting journal on device hda2.
> 	journal commit I/O error
> 	ext3_abort called.
> 	EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
> 	Remounting filesystem read-only
> 
> The above read-only remount effectively ends the test run.  

This test is a little intentional.
(Normal I/O may fail, but journal commit I/O doesn't fail)

If you want to do this, you could put journal on the other device.

> Implementation approach is to extend the existing
> address-start/address-end mechanism specifying a range _required_ to
> be found on the stack, by the addition of an address range to be
> _rejected_.  

The only problem about this is, the users who set reject address range really
don't want to insert failures from the address range. So they have to change
stacktrace-depth large enough. It will cause large slow down by aggressive
stacktrace and there is no guarantee to prevent from injecting failures the
address range.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-20 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-08 17:45 [patch 0/7] Fault-injection capabilities (v6) Akinobu Mita
2006-11-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -mm] fault-injection: reject-failure-if-any-caller-lies-within-specified range Don Mullis
2006-11-20 10:57   ` Akinobu Mita [this message]
2006-11-20 19:24     ` Don Mullis
2006-11-20 19:52       ` Akinobu Mita

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061120105735.GA9795@APFDCB5C \
    --to=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dwm@meer.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox