public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:17:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061120221756.GA8708@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611191008310.3692@woody.osdl.org>

One reason why I've generally avoided using suspend-to-ram is that
after my laptop (IBM Thinkpad T60p) comes out of suspend-to-ram, it is
consuming 30W of power --- as opposed to before I hibernated, when my
laptop was consuming only 17W or 18W of power.  (And even without
doing things like unloading all of my USB modules, normally my laptop
will consume about 24W after a fresh reboot --- which makes the 30W
power consumption after a suspend-to-ram especially troubling,)

If I unload all of my USB modules, and shutdown the parallel port, the
wired ethernet port, etc., I get power savinges down to 17W --- and
once I was able to push it all the way down to 15W, although in
practice it's much more common that I can get the power consumption
down to 17W or 18W.  Unfortunately, after the laptop wakss up from a
suspend-to-ram, the laptop is apparently powering up all of the
devices in high power mode while I can get some of the power savings
back by manually loading and then unlodaing a whole bunch of device
drivers, in practice that only gets me from 30W to 24W or so.  This is
probably much more of a hardware bug than an OS bug, but because of
this fact, if I'm going to be running the laptop for any amount of
time after resume, I'm better off using suspend-to-disk.

If someone has a suggestion for how I can save the power state of all
of the various components in my laptop so that the laptop cna be
brought back to the 18W state after a suspend-to-ram, I'm all ears....

						- Ted

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-20 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-19  8:18 [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND Chuck Ebbert
2006-11-19  8:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-19 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-19 17:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-19 18:21     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-19 18:55       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-19 19:54         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-19 21:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-19 23:21             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-19 22:59         ` Romano Giannetti
2006-11-20 22:17       ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2006-11-21  2:02         ` Matthew Garrett
2006-11-23 13:28       ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-19 17:52   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-19 18:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-19 19:02       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-19 19:55         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-19 18:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-19 19:53       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-23 13:39         ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-23 21:36           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-23 21:36             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-24  6:39               ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-24 18:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-25  0:22                   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-25 14:11                   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-25 17:12                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-26  4:53                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-28 10:01                         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-29 10:21                           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-29 10:30                             ` [rfc patch] " Mike Galbraith
2006-11-29 14:15                               ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-29 19:49                               ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-29 20:05                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-11-19 21:41   ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-11-19 22:04   ` Christer Weinigel
2006-12-03 21:40     ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-04 10:50       ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-04 13:56         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2006-11-22 15:23   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-22 15:42     ` Alan
2006-11-24 23:40       ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-25 16:08         ` Alan
2006-11-25 17:18           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-26 20:52           ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-22 23:05   ` Mark Lord
     [not found] <fa.U3NcOE+DHLOUMSq6HkaGglGl7hQ@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.YMVQ6sabKF/IkEHUCoiQoxoHWZA@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.c5fVj98hBgqoUumwbA9jymiSXr8@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.zMBHTAXYfXNe2TVX89s3qsC2HRk@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]       ` <fa.yA6cvuiGulIRQfqY+E9joR2nWog@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]         ` <fa.bo0iOgKqELDD50VEZpxeUpzPsMg@ifi.uio.no>
2006-11-26  7:11           ` Robert Hancock
2006-11-26 10:13             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-26 20:30               ` Robert Hancock
2006-11-27 13:51                 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-03 12:49                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-27 12:20             ` Stefan Seyfried

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061120221756.GA8708@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox