Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)

Andrew Morton
2006-11-24T20:48:34Z

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:58:55 +0100
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:

>
> > A slightly smarter, but not quite as obviously correct,
>
> I think it's better to go for the "obviously correct" approach right now
> And sorting multiple times should be fine
>

yup, that's what I'd decided.