From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Simple script that locks up my box with recent kernels
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:57:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061122105703.GZ8055@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490611220255v53bc667y74b05e2b69281f25@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 22 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 22/11/06, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 21 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> I don't think we use any irq-disable locking in the VM itself, but I
> >could
> >> imagine some nasty situation with the block device layer getting into a
> >> deadlock with interrupts disabled when it runs out of queue entries and
> >> cannot allocate more memory..
> >
> >Not likely. Request allocation is done with GFP_NOIO and backed by a
> >memory pool, so as long the vm doesn't go totally nuts because
> >__GFP_WAIT is set, we should be safe there. If it did go crazy, I
> >suspect a sysrq-t would still work.
> >
> >If bouncing is involved for swap, we do have a potential deadlock issue
> >that isn't fixed yet. I just whipped up this completely untested patch,
> >it should shed some light on that issue.
> >
> Thanks Jens, I'll apply that later tonight and force a few lockups and
> see if I get any extra details with that patch.
Can you post a full dmesg too, as well as clarify which device holds the
swap space?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-22 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-06 23:36 Simple script that locks up my box with recent kernels Jesper Juhl
2006-10-06 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-07 0:06 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 0:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 3:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-07 21:02 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 21:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-08 23:33 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-16 22:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-16 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-16 23:13 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-23 20:30 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 0:46 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-22 3:25 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-22 3:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-22 3:49 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-22 10:32 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-11-22 17:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-22 8:03 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-22 10:55 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 10:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-11-22 11:04 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 11:07 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-23 23:52 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-24 6:52 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-24 9:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-24 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-24 9:52 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-23 10:22 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-23 23:48 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-22 11:00 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-24 0:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-07 3:40 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061122105703.GZ8055@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox