From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gaston <jason.d.gaston@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, i2c@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc6] i2c-i801: SMBus patch for Intel ICH9
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:42:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061123144221.866c07cb.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1164284758.31358.781.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Hi Arjan,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:25:57 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 13:09 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:19:12 -0800, Jason Gaston wrote:
> > > This updated patch adds the Intel ICH9 LPC and SMBus Controller DID's.
> > > This patch relies on the irq ICH9 patch to pci_ids.h.
> >
> > Looks good. Care to also update Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-i801? I
> > see it misses at least the ICH8 and ESB2 as well.
> >
> > I would also appreciate an update to lm_sensors' sensors-detect script,
> > if you could send a patch to the sensors list.
>
>
> hmmm couldn't the sensors-detect script just at runtime look at the pci
> tables in the modules? that way no need to duplicate/update all of this
> in multiple places...
Not really. It is important that sensors-detect knows about chips which
are not supported by the running kernel. That way, we can tell the
users to try the latest version of sensors-detect when they report that
hardware monitoring doesn't work out of the box, and from the output,
we can tell them which kernel they need to upgrade to. If
sensors-detect reads the list of supported devices from the kernel,
instead of having its own, it will no longer work, by definition.
Additionally, sensors-detect is still supposed to support 2.4 kernels,
and I don't think 2.4 drivers advertise the list of devices they
support.
What we could do, on the other hand, is check the detected device ID
against the list the running kernel driver supports, to let the user
know that his/her chip is not supported by his/her kernel. Care to
provide a patch adding this functionality to sensors-detect?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-23 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-22 23:19 [PATCH 2.6.19-rc6] i2c-i801: SMBus patch for Intel ICH9 Jason Gaston
2006-11-23 12:09 ` Jean Delvare
2006-11-23 12:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-23 13:42 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-27 19:20 Gaston, Jason D
2006-11-28 20:52 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061123144221.866c07cb.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=jason.d.gaston@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox