public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin A. Fink" <fink@mpe.mpg.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SATA Performance with Intel ICH6
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:07:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611241407.01210.fink@mpe.mpg.de> (raw)

Dear all,

I found out, that writing to a SATA harddisk costs around 20% of the
computers cpu time. I write blocks of 1MB size to a file. Write performance
is around 51MB/s what I think is really good. My computer has an Intel ICH6
chipset and a 3.2GHz Pentium 4 processor.
If I understand the design of this chipset correctly, then I would have
expected, that the CPU needs to do only few work, instead I found out, that
writing to disk seems to be really hard work for the CPU.

Can I do anything to optimize writing from memory to disk?

My final aim is to get around 140MB/s of data from 3 different Gigabit
Ethernet cards and store it on 3 harddisk drives that perform 50MB/s.
>From the SATA bus side there should be no problem. Each of the 4 SATAs on
this ICH6 chipset are capable of 150MB/s.

So what makes my CPU that slow? Is it a hardware problem or a problem of
SATA driver of my operating system?

time dd if=/dev/zero of=test.zero bs=1M count=1000
results in

real 0m52.561s
user 0m0.003s
sys  0m7.407s

and strace dd... gives among other information
6.84s 1004calls syscall: write

So I spend 45s of 52s within the kernel. Why so long?


By the way: I'm working with SuSE Linux 9.2 on a Dell Desktop PC, 1GB RAM

Thank you for answers,

Martin

             reply	other threads:[~2006-11-24 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-24 13:07 Martin A. Fink [this message]
2006-11-24 13:33 ` SATA Performance with Intel ICH6 Alan
2006-11-24 14:10   ` Martin A. Fink
2006-11-24 14:30     ` Alan
2006-11-24 14:54       ` Martin A. Fink
2006-11-25 19:23     ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-24 14:05 ` Ed Sweetman
2006-11-24 22:10 ` J.A. Magallón
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-24 14:30 Daniel J Blueman
2006-11-28 10:09 Martin A. Fink
2006-11-28 10:43 ` Alan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200611241407.01210.fink@mpe.mpg.de \
    --to=fink@mpe.mpg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox