[PATCH-2.4] jfs: incorrect use of "&&" instead of "&"

[Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>]

Hi Dave,

I'm about to merge this fix in 2.4. It's already in 2.6 BTW.
Do you have any objection ?

Thanks in advance,
Willy

>From b14cb91c6621908f8e957aad5a85d6c41b31dfea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:57:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] jfs: incorrect use of "&&" instead of "&"

in jfs_txnmgr, the use of "tblk->flag && COMMIT_DELETE" in a
if() condition is obviously wrong. This bug has already been
fixed in 2.6.

Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
---
 fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
index 62e6493..4e6a280 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ int txCommit(tid_t tid,		/* transaction 
 		jfs_ip = JFS_IP(ip);
 
 		if (test_and_clear_cflag(COMMIT_Syncdata, ip) &&
-		    ((tblk->flag && COMMIT_DELETE) == 0))
+		    ((tblk->flag & COMMIT_DELETE) == 0))
 			fsync_inode_data_buffers(ip);
 
 		/*
-- 
1.4.2.4