From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm2 (end earlier): WARNING at lib/kobject.c:172 kobject_init() on resume from disk
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 00:15:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611260015.53710.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611252320.12498.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Saturday, 25 November 2006 23:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 November 2006 22:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:07:06 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I get similar traces on every resume from disk on SMP systems:
> > >
> > > WARNING at lib/kobject.c:172 kobject_init()
> > >
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [<ffffffff80265559>] dump_trace+0xaa/0x3fd
> > > [<ffffffff802658e8>] show_trace+0x3c/0x52
> > > [<ffffffff80265913>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
> > > [<ffffffff8031c1ad>] kobject_init+0x3f/0x8a
> > > [<ffffffff8031c298>] kobject_register+0x1a/0x3e
> > > [<ffffffff8038e5b4>] sysdev_register+0x5f/0xec
> > > [<ffffffff8026af39>] mce_create_device+0x79/0x103
> > > [<ffffffff8026afed>] mce_cpu_callback+0x2a/0xbd
> > > [<ffffffff8026112f>] notifier_call_chain+0x29/0x3e
> > > [<ffffffff8028e809>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0xb
> > > [<ffffffff80299f18>] _cpu_up+0xc2/0xd5
> > > [<ffffffff80299f56>] cpu_up+0x2b/0x42
> > > [<ffffffff80299fbb>] enable_nonboot_cpus+0x4e/0x9b
> > > [<ffffffff802a35da>] snapshot_ioctl+0x1a0/0x5d2
> > > [<ffffffff8023d9cd>] do_ioctl+0x5e/0x77
> > > [<ffffffff8022d785>] vfs_ioctl+0x256/0x273
> > > [<ffffffff8024770b>] sys_ioctl+0x5f/0x82
> > > [<ffffffff8025811e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> > > DWARF2 unwinder stuck at system_call+0x7e/0x83
> > > Leftover inexact backtrace:
> > >
> > > False positive?
> > >
> >
> > Don't know. The changelog in
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/kobject-warn.patch
> > is pretty pathetic.
> >
> > Perhaps mce_remove_device() isn't being called.
>
> I've added some debugging code into mce_remove_device() which shows that it is
> being called when the CPU is removed.
>
> Investigation continues.
Ah, I think the problem is that the last user of a kobject doesn't decrease
the refcount in kref_put(), so if the same kobject is registered for the
second time, the refcount is still one and the warning triggers.
So, it seems, this is a false positive and I think we can get rid of it in the
following way (tested and works):
---
Make mce_remove_device() clean up the kobject in per_cpu(device_mce, cpu)
after it has been unregistered.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c 2006-11-25 23:56:08.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c 2006-11-26 00:15:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -651,6 +651,7 @@ static void mce_remove_device(unsigned i
sysdev_remove_file(&per_cpu(device_mce,cpu), &attr_tolerant);
sysdev_remove_file(&per_cpu(device_mce,cpu), &attr_check_interval);
sysdev_unregister(&per_cpu(device_mce,cpu));
+ per_cpu(device_mce, cpu).kobj = (struct kobject){ 0 };
}
/* Get notified when a cpu comes on/off. Be hotplug friendly. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-25 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-22 21:07 2.6.19-rc5-mm2 (end earlier): WARNING at lib/kobject.c:172 kobject_init() on resume from disk Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-22 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-23 0:39 ` Greg KH
2006-11-23 13:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-25 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-25 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2006-11-25 23:43 ` Greg KH
2006-11-26 11:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-26 19:29 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611260015.53710.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox