* [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder
@ 2006-11-29 11:13 Jan Beulich
2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-11-29 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel
Tighten the requirements on both input to and output from the Dwarf2
unwinder.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-29 10:03:03.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-28 17:18:45.000000000 +0100
@@ -159,12 +159,19 @@ dump_trace_unwind(struct unwind_frame_in
{
struct ops_and_data *oad = (struct ops_and_data *)data;
int n = 0;
+ unsigned long sp = UNW_SP(info);
+ if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
+ return -1;
while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) {
n++;
oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info));
if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
break;
+ if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
+ && sp > UNW_SP(info))
+ break;
+ sp = UNW_SP(info);
}
return n;
}
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-29 10:03:18.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-28 17:18:28.000000000 +0100
@@ -225,12 +225,19 @@ static int dump_trace_unwind(struct unwi
{
struct ops_and_data *oad = (struct ops_and_data *)context;
int n = 0;
+ unsigned long sp = UNW_SP(info);
+ if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
+ return -1;
while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) {
n++;
oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info));
if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
break;
+ if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
+ && sp > UNW_SP(info))
+ break;
+ sp = UNW_SP(info);
}
return n;
}
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/include/asm-i386/unwind.h 2006-11-29 10:04:04.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/include/asm-i386/unwind.h 2006-11-28 17:20:26.000000000 +0100
@@ -78,17 +78,13 @@ extern asmlinkage int arch_unwind_init_r
void *arg),
void *arg);
-static inline int arch_unw_user_mode(const struct unwind_frame_info *info)
+static inline int arch_unw_user_mode(/*const*/ struct unwind_frame_info *info)
{
-#if 0 /* This can only work when selector register and EFLAGS saves/restores
- are properly annotated (and tracked in UNW_REGISTER_INFO). */
- return user_mode_vm(&info->regs);
-#else
- return info->regs.eip < PAGE_OFFSET
+ return user_mode_vm(&info->regs)
+ || info->regs.eip < PAGE_OFFSET
|| (info->regs.eip >= __fix_to_virt(FIX_VDSO)
- && info->regs.eip < __fix_to_virt(FIX_VDSO) + PAGE_SIZE)
+ && info->regs.eip < __fix_to_virt(FIX_VDSO) + PAGE_SIZE)
|| info->regs.esp < PAGE_OFFSET;
-#endif
}
#else
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/include/asm-x86_64/unwind.h 2006-11-29 10:04:06.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/include/asm-x86_64/unwind.h 2006-11-28 17:18:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -87,14 +87,10 @@ extern int arch_unwind_init_running(stru
static inline int arch_unw_user_mode(const struct unwind_frame_info *info)
{
-#if 0 /* This can only work when selector register saves/restores
- are properly annotated (and tracked in UNW_REGISTER_INFO). */
- return user_mode(&info->regs);
-#else
- return (long)info->regs.rip >= 0
+ return user_mode(&info->regs)
+ || (long)info->regs.rip >= 0
|| (info->regs.rip >= VSYSCALL_START && info->regs.rip < VSYSCALL_END)
|| (long)info->regs.rsp >= 0;
-#endif
}
#else
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/kernel/unwind.c 2006-11-29 10:04:11.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/kernel/unwind.c 2006-11-28 16:35:58.000000000 +0100
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static const struct {
typedef unsigned long uleb128_t;
typedef signed long sleb128_t;
+#define sleb128abs __builtin_labs
static struct unwind_table {
struct {
@@ -786,7 +787,7 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
#define FRAME_REG(r, t) (((t *)frame)[reg_info[r].offs])
const u32 *fde = NULL, *cie = NULL;
const u8 *ptr = NULL, *end = NULL;
- unsigned long pc = UNW_PC(frame) - frame->call_frame;
+ unsigned long pc = UNW_PC(frame) - frame->call_frame, sp;
unsigned long startLoc = 0, endLoc = 0, cfa;
unsigned i;
signed ptrType = -1;
@@ -935,6 +936,9 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
state.dataAlign = get_sleb128(&ptr, end);
if (state.codeAlign == 0 || state.dataAlign == 0 || ptr >= end)
cie = NULL;
+ else if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
+ || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign))
+ return -EPERM;
else {
retAddrReg = state.version <= 1 ? *ptr++ : get_uleb128(&ptr, end);
/* skip augmentation */
@@ -966,6 +970,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+ if ((UNW_SP(frame) | UNW_FP(frame)) % sizeof(unsigned long))
+ return -EPERM;
top = STACK_TOP(frame->task);
bottom = STACK_BOTTOM(frame->task);
# if FRAME_RETADDR_OFFSET < 0
@@ -1015,6 +1021,7 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
|| state.regs[retAddrReg].where == Nowhere
|| state.cfa.reg >= ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info)
|| reg_info[state.cfa.reg].width != sizeof(unsigned long)
+ || FRAME_REG(state.cfa.reg, unsigned long) % sizeof(unsigned long)
|| state.cfa.offs % sizeof(unsigned long))
return -EIO;
/* update frame */
@@ -1035,6 +1042,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
#else
# define CASES CASE(8); CASE(16); CASE(32); CASE(64)
#endif
+ pc = UNW_PC(frame);
+ sp = UNW_SP(frame);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(state.regs); ++i) {
if (REG_INVALID(i)) {
if (state.regs[i].where == Nowhere)
@@ -1115,6 +1124,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
}
}
+ if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
+ || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)
+ || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame)))
+ return -EIO;
+
return 0;
#undef CASES
#undef FRAME_REG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder 2006-11-29 11:13 [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder Jan Beulich @ 2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen 2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich 2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-11-29 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: linux-kernel On Wednesday 29 November 2006 12:13, Jan Beulich wrote: > Tighten the requirements on both input to and output from the Dwarf2 > unwinder. Thanks for doing this. > while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) { > n++; > oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info)); > if (arch_unw_user_mode(info)) > break; > + if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) > + && sp > UNW_SP(info)) > + break; Hmm, but that wouldn't catch the case when the SP is completely corrupted for some reason. Maybe it would be better to just run a brute force check here like the old in_exception_stack(). Similar on x86-64. > + if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign > + || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign) > + || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame))) > + return -EIO; Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know when dwarf2 is corrupted. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder 2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen @ 2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich 2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-11-29 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel >> while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) { >> n++; >> oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info)); >> if (arch_unw_user_mode(info)) >> break; >> + if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) >> + && sp > UNW_SP(info)) >> + break; > >Hmm, but that wouldn't catch the case when the SP is completely >corrupted for some reason. >Maybe it would be better to just run a brute force check here like >the old in_exception_stack(). Similar on x86-64. Correct. Even though I know Linus disagrees here, I'm not sure I want to do this, as my ultimate goal would be to eliminate the hand-crafted linking (which we know got broken a few times on x86-64, because it's so easy to forget about). Not the least of the reasons for this is that this increases the chances of stucks. >> + if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign >> + || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign) >> + || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame))) >> + return -EIO; > >Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know >when dwarf2 is corrupted. Certainly, will be a follow-up patch. Jan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder 2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen 2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich @ 2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich 2006-12-06 16:41 ` Andi Kleen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-12-04 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel >Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know >when dwarf2 is corrupted. Here's a patch to do this and some more (applies on firstfloor tree, but probably not on plain 2.6.19). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> --- linux-2.6.19-ff/kernel/unwind.c 2006-12-04 15:39:48.000000000 +0100 +++ 2.6.19-ff-unwind-debug-msg/kernel/unwind.c 2006-12-04 14:23:36.000000000 +0100 @@ -137,6 +137,17 @@ struct unwind_state { static const struct cfa badCFA = { ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info), 1 }; +static unsigned unwind_debug; +static int __init unwind_debug_setup(char *s) +{ + unwind_debug = simple_strtoul(s, NULL, 0); + return 1; +} +__setup("unwind_debug=", unwind_debug_setup); +#define dprintk(lvl, fmt, args...) \ + ((void)(lvl > unwind_debug \ + || printk(KERN_DEBUG "unwind: " fmt "\n", ##args))) + static struct unwind_table *find_table(unsigned long pc) { struct unwind_table *table; @@ -281,6 +292,7 @@ static void __init setup_unwind_table(st hdrSize = 4 + sizeof(unsigned long) + sizeof(unsigned int) + 2 * n * sizeof(unsigned long); + dprintk(2, "Binary lookup table size for %s: %lu bytes", table->name, hdrSize); header = alloc(hdrSize); if (!header) return; @@ -500,13 +512,17 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const const unsigned long *pul; } ptr; - if (ptrType < 0 || ptrType == DW_EH_PE_omit) + if (ptrType < 0 || ptrType == DW_EH_PE_omit) { + dprintk(1, "Invalid pointer encoding %02X (%p,%p).", ptrType, *pLoc, end); return 0; + } ptr.p8 = *pLoc; switch(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_FORM) { case DW_EH_PE_data2: - if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p16u + 1)) + if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p16u + 1)) { + dprintk(1, "Data16 overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); return 0; + } if(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_signed) value = get_unaligned(ptr.p16s++); else @@ -514,8 +530,10 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const break; case DW_EH_PE_data4: #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT - if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p32u + 1)) + if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p32u + 1)) { + dprintk(1, "Data32 overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); return 0; + } if(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_signed) value = get_unaligned(ptr.p32s++); else @@ -527,8 +545,10 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(u32) != sizeof(value)); #endif case DW_EH_PE_native: - if (end < (const void *)(ptr.pul + 1)) + if (end < (const void *)(ptr.pul + 1)) { + dprintk(1, "DataUL overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); return 0; + } value = get_unaligned(ptr.pul++); break; case DW_EH_PE_leb128: @@ -536,10 +556,14 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const value = ptrType & DW_EH_PE_signed ? get_sleb128(&ptr.p8, end) : get_uleb128(&ptr.p8, end); - if ((const void *)ptr.p8 > end) + if ((const void *)ptr.p8 > end) { + dprintk(1, "DataLEB overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); return 0; + } break; default: + dprintk(2, "Cannot decode pointer type %02X (%p,%p).", + ptrType, ptr.p8, end); return 0; } switch(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_ADJUST) { @@ -549,11 +573,16 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const value += (unsigned long)*pLoc; break; default: + dprintk(2, "Cannot adjust pointer type %02X (%p,%p).", + ptrType, *pLoc, end); return 0; } if ((ptrType & DW_EH_PE_indirect) - && probe_kernel_address((unsigned long *)value, value)) + && probe_kernel_address((unsigned long *)value, value)) { + dprintk(1, "Cannot read indirect value %lx (%p,%p).", + value, *pLoc, end); return 0; + } *pLoc = ptr.p8; return value; @@ -702,8 +731,10 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start, state->label = NULL; return 1; } - if (state->stackDepth >= MAX_STACK_DEPTH) + if (state->stackDepth >= MAX_STACK_DEPTH) { + dprintk(1, "State stack overflow (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); return 0; + } state->stack[state->stackDepth++] = ptr.p8; break; case DW_CFA_restore_state: @@ -718,8 +749,10 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start, result = processCFI(start, end, 0, ptrType, state); state->loc = loc; state->label = label; - } else + } else { + dprintk(1, "State stack underflow (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); return 0; + } break; case DW_CFA_def_cfa: state->cfa.reg = get_uleb128(&ptr.p8, end); @@ -751,6 +784,7 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start, break; case DW_CFA_GNU_window_save: default: + dprintk(1, "Unrecognized CFI op %02X (%p,%p).", ptr.p8[-1], ptr.p8 - 1, end); result = 0; break; } @@ -766,12 +800,17 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start, set_rule(*ptr.p8++ & 0x3f, Nowhere, 0, state); break; } - if (ptr.p8 > end) + if (ptr.p8 > end) { + dprintk(1, "Data overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); result = 0; + } if (result && targetLoc != 0 && targetLoc < state->loc) return 1; } + if (result && ptr.p8 < end) + dprintk(1, "Data underrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end); + return result && ptr.p8 == end && (targetLoc == 0 @@ -843,6 +882,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra hdr[3]); } } + if(hdr && !fde) + dprintk(3, "Binary lookup for %lx failed.", pc); if (fde != NULL) { cie = cie_for_fde(fde, table); @@ -864,6 +905,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra fde = NULL; } else fde = NULL; + if(!fde) + dprintk(1, "Binary lookup result for %lx discarded.", pc); } if (fde == NULL) { for (fde = table->address, tableSize = table->size; @@ -895,6 +938,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra if (pc >= startLoc && pc < endLoc) break; } + if(!fde) + dprintk(3, "Linear lookup for %lx failed.", pc); } } if (cie != NULL) { @@ -928,6 +973,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra if (ptr >= end || *ptr) cie = NULL; } + if(!cie) + dprintk(1, "CIE unusable (%p,%p).", ptr, end); ++ptr; } if (cie != NULL) { @@ -938,9 +985,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra if (state.codeAlign == 0 || state.dataAlign == 0 || ptr >= end) cie = NULL; else if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign - || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)) + || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)) { + dprintk(1, "Input pointer(s) misaligned (%lx,%lx).", + UNW_PC(frame), UNW_SP(frame)); return -EPERM; - else { + } else { retAddrReg = state.version <= 1 ? *ptr++ : get_uleb128(&ptr, end); /* skip augmentation */ if (((const char *)(cie + 2))[1] == 'z') { @@ -954,6 +1003,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra || reg_info[retAddrReg].width != sizeof(unsigned long)) cie = NULL; } + if(!cie) + dprintk(1, "CIE validation failed (%p,%p).", ptr, end); } if (cie != NULL) { state.cieStart = ptr; @@ -967,6 +1018,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra if ((ptr += augSize) > end) fde = NULL; } + if(!fde) + dprintk(1, "FDE validation failed (%p,%p).", ptr, end); } if (cie == NULL || fde == NULL) { #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER @@ -1025,8 +1078,10 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra || state.cfa.reg >= ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info) || reg_info[state.cfa.reg].width != sizeof(unsigned long) || FRAME_REG(state.cfa.reg, unsigned long) % sizeof(unsigned long) - || state.cfa.offs % sizeof(unsigned long)) + || state.cfa.offs % sizeof(unsigned long)) { + dprintk(1, "Unusable unwind info (%p,%p).", ptr, end); return -EIO; + } /* update frame */ #ifndef CONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME if(frame->call_frame @@ -1051,6 +1106,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra if (REG_INVALID(i)) { if (state.regs[i].where == Nowhere) continue; + dprintk(1, "Cannot restore register %u (%d).", + i, state.regs[i].where); return -EIO; } switch(state.regs[i].where) { @@ -1059,8 +1116,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra case Register: if (state.regs[i].value >= ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info) || REG_INVALID(state.regs[i].value) - || reg_info[i].width > reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width) + || reg_info[i].width > reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width) { + dprintk(1, "Cannot restore register %u from register %lu.", + i, state.regs[i].value); return -EIO; + } switch(reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width) { #define CASE(n) \ case sizeof(u##n): \ @@ -1070,6 +1130,9 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra CASES; #undef CASE default: + dprintk(1, "Unsupported register size %u (%lu).", + reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width, + state.regs[i].value); return -EIO; } break; @@ -1094,12 +1157,17 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra CASES; #undef CASE default: + dprintk(1, "Unsupported register size %u (%u).", + reg_info[i].width, i); return -EIO; } break; case Value: - if (reg_info[i].width != sizeof(unsigned long)) + if (reg_info[i].width != sizeof(unsigned long)) { + dprintk(1, "Unsupported value size %u (%u).", + reg_info[i].width, i); return -EIO; + } FRAME_REG(i, unsigned long) = cfa + state.regs[i].value * state.dataAlign; break; @@ -1111,8 +1179,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra % sizeof(unsigned long) || addr < startLoc || addr + sizeof(unsigned long) < addr - || addr + sizeof(unsigned long) > endLoc) + || addr + sizeof(unsigned long) > endLoc) { + dprintk(1, "Bad memory location %lx (%lx).", + addr, state.regs[i].value); return -EIO; + } switch(reg_info[i].width) { #define CASE(n) case sizeof(u##n): \ probe_kernel_address((u##n *)addr, FRAME_REG(i, u##n)); \ @@ -1120,6 +1191,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra CASES; #undef CASE default: + dprintk(1, "Unsupported memory size %u (%u).", + reg_info[i].width, i); return -EIO; } } @@ -1128,9 +1201,15 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra } if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign - || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign) - || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame))) + || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)) { + dprintk(1, "Output pointer(s) misaligned (%lx,%lx).", + UNW_PC(frame), UNW_SP(frame)); return -EIO; + } + if (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame)) { + dprintk(1, "No progress (%lx,%lx).", pc, sp); + return -EIO; + } return 0; #undef CASES ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder 2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich @ 2006-12-06 16:41 ` Andi Kleen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-12-06 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: linux-kernel On Monday 04 December 2006 17:20, Jan Beulich wrote: > >Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know > >when dwarf2 is corrupted. > > Here's a patch to do this and some more (applies on firstfloor tree, but > probably not on plain 2.6.19). Added thanks I added Documentation of the new option. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-06 17:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-11-29 11:13 [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder Jan Beulich 2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen 2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich 2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich 2006-12-06 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox