public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:08:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061201210849.GF3078@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165006331.1194.96.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com>

On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:52:11PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> code clean up are not without risk and with no regression test suite to
> verify
> that a "cleanup" has not broken something. Cleanups are very much a
> hindrance to stabilization. With no know working points in a code
> history it becomes difficult
> to bisect changes and figure out when bugs were introduced
> Especially when cleanups are mixed in with bug fixes.
> 
> Pretty code does not equal correct code.

No, but convoluted and unreadable code ends up being crappier due
to lack of review.  And that's aside of the memory footprint,
likeliness of bugs introduced by code modifications (having in-core
and on-disk data structures with different contents and the same C
type => trouble that won't be caught by compiler), etc.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-01 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-30 12:15 [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70] Steven Whitehouse
2006-12-01 19:19 ` Russell Cattelan
2006-12-01 19:25   ` Al Viro
2006-12-01 20:52     ` [Cluster-devel] " Russell Cattelan
2006-12-01 21:08       ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-12-01 23:29         ` Russell Cattelan
2006-12-02  1:10           ` Al Viro
2006-12-03 19:06             ` Russell Cattelan
2006-12-03 19:54               ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-03 22:44                 ` Alan
2006-12-02 11:40           ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-03 20:21             ` Rik van Riel
2006-12-04 10:05   ` Steven Whitehouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061201210849.GF3078@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=cattelan@thebarn.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox