public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:47:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200612021147.40505.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061201172149.GC3078@ftp.linux.org.uk>

On Friday 01 December 2006 18:21, Al Viro wrote:
>  There is a tempting
> possibility to do that gradually, with all intermediates still in working
> state, provided that on all platforms currently supported by the kernel
> unsigned long and void * are indeed passed the same way (again, only for
> current kernel targets and existing gcc versions).  Namely, we could
>         * introduce SETUP_TIMER variant with cast to void (*)(unsigned long)
>         * switch to its use, converting callback instances to take pointers
> at the same time.  That would be done in reasonably sized groups.
>         * once it's over, flip ->function to void (*)(void *), ->data to
> void * and update SETUP_TIMER accordingly; deal with remaining few instances
> of ->function.

Another alternative might be to define an intermediate version of
timer_list that avoids adding new macros, like

struct timer_list {
	struct list_head entry;
­	unsigned long expires;

­	void (*function)(union { unsigned long l; void *p; }
				 __attribute__((transparent_union)));
­	union {
		unsigned long data __deprecated;
		void *obj;
	};

­	struct tvec_t_base_s *base;
};

Unfortunately, this relies more on gcc specific behavior than we
may want, and it makes it possible to abuse in new ways, like defining
a function to take an unsigned long argument, but passing the data
as void *obj.

	Arnd <><

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-02 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-01 17:21 [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Al Viro
2006-12-02  6:29 ` Daniel Berlin
2006-12-02 12:36   ` Al Viro
2006-12-02  9:23 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-02 12:42   ` Al Viro
2006-12-02 20:53     ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-02 10:47 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2006-12-02 12:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-12-02 14:05   ` Al Viro
2006-12-02 14:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-12-02 16:02       ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-12-02 18:06         ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-12-02 18:19           ` Al Viro
2006-12-02 18:27             ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-12-02 18:40               ` Al Viro
2006-12-02 18:48                 ` Al Viro
2006-12-02 21:43                 ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-02 21:59                   ` Al Viro
2006-12-02 22:13                     ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-02 22:40                       ` Al Viro
2006-12-02 23:06                         ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-03 10:21                           ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-03 11:27                             ` Russell King
2006-12-03 15:21                               ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-03 21:01                                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-03 22:52                                   ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-03 23:15                                     ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-04 11:14                               ` David Howells
2006-12-04 12:16                                 ` Russell King
2006-12-04 13:03                                   ` David Howells
2006-12-04 13:29                                     ` Russell King
2006-12-04 14:17                                       ` David Howells
2006-12-04 14:22                                         ` Russell King
2006-12-04 11:48             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-04 12:22               ` David Howells
2006-12-06  0:24                 ` Al Viro
2006-12-06 10:20                   ` David Howells
2006-12-12  9:59                   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-02 21:32         ` Roman Zippel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200612021147.40505.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox