From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759465AbWLBQC4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:02:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759464AbWLBQC4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:02:56 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:52381 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759460AbWLBQCz (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:02:55 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:02:52 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Message-ID: <20061202160252.GQ14076@parisc-linux.org> References: <20061201172149.GC3078@ftp.linux.org.uk> <1165064370.24604.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061202140521.GJ3078@ftp.linux.org.uk> <1165070713.24604.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1165070713.24604.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:45:12PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What's the cruft ? > > struct bla = container_of(timer, struct bla, timer); ??? That's it, right there. Any idea how much we've bloated the kernel with sysfs, just by insisting that the struct device not be the first item in the struct? There's any number of 2- and 3- line functions calling each other, each adding and subtracting constants from the pointers passed to them. This was a huge mistake, IMO.