From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] net: dev_watchdog() locking fix
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:19:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061208151902.4c8bb012.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061207210657.GA23229@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:06:57 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:55:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > fallout of the recent big networking merge i guess. Tested fix below.
> > David, Herbert, do you agree with it, or is it a false positive?
>
> I agree that this is a bug, but the fix is in the wrong spot. The
> dev_watchdog function already runs in softirq context so it doesn't
> need to disable BH.
>
> You can almost be guaranteed that if netpoll is involved in a bug
> then it should be fixed :)
>
> In this case, it's taking the tx lock in process context which is
> not allowed. So it should disable BH before taking the tx lock.
>
Like this?
/* don't get messages out of order, and no recursion */
if (skb_queue_len(&npinfo->txq) == 0 &&
npinfo->poll_owner != smp_processor_id()) {
local_bh_disable(); /* Where's netif_tx_trylock_bh()? */
if (netif_tx_trylock(dev)) {
/* try until next clock tick */
for (tries = jiffies_to_usecs(1)/USEC_PER_POLL;
tries > 0; --tries) {
if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev))
status = dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, dev);
if (status == NETDEV_TX_OK)
break;
/* tickle device maybe there is some cleanup */
netpoll_poll(np);
udelay(USEC_PER_POLL);
}
netif_tx_unlock(dev);
}
local_bh_enable();
}
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c~netpoll-locking-fix
+++ a/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -242,22 +242,26 @@ static void netpoll_send_skb(struct netp
/* don't get messages out of order, and no recursion */
if (skb_queue_len(&npinfo->txq) == 0 &&
- npinfo->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
- netif_tx_trylock(dev)) {
- /* try until next clock tick */
- for (tries = jiffies_to_usecs(1)/USEC_PER_POLL; tries > 0; --tries) {
- if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev))
- status = dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, dev);
+ npinfo->poll_owner != smp_processor_id()) {
+ local_bh_disable(); /* Where's netif_tx_trylock_bh()? */
+ if (netif_tx_trylock(dev)) {
+ /* try until next clock tick */
+ for (tries = jiffies_to_usecs(1)/USEC_PER_POLL;
+ tries > 0; --tries) {
+ if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev))
+ status = dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, dev);
- if (status == NETDEV_TX_OK)
- break;
+ if (status == NETDEV_TX_OK)
+ break;
- /* tickle device maybe there is some cleanup */
- netpoll_poll(np);
+ /* tickle device maybe there is some cleanup */
+ netpoll_poll(np);
- udelay(USEC_PER_POLL);
+ udelay(USEC_PER_POLL);
+ }
+ netif_tx_unlock(dev);
}
- netif_tx_unlock(dev);
+ local_bh_enable();
}
if (status != NETDEV_TX_OK) {
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-08 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-06 22:30 [patch] ACPI, i686, x86_64: fix laptop bootup hang in init_acpi() Ingo Molnar
2006-12-06 23:57 ` Len Brown
2006-12-07 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-07 12:11 ` [patch] x86_64: do not enable the NMI watchdog by default Ingo Molnar
2006-12-07 12:30 ` Alan
2006-12-07 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07 20:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-07 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-07 20:55 ` [patch] net: dev_watchdog() locking fix Ingo Molnar
2006-12-07 21:06 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-08 23:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-12-08 23:59 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-09 22:02 ` David Miller
2006-12-11 7:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-11 7:51 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-11 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-11 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07 17:24 ` [patch] x86_64: do not enable the NMI watchdog by default Andi Kleen
2006-12-07 2:28 ` [patch] ACPI, i686, x86_64: fix laptop bootup hang in init_acpi() Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-07 4:47 ` Karsten Wiese
2006-12-07 11:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-07 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061208151902.4c8bb012.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox