Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20

Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-12-08T12:51:12Z

On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:04:23PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 08 December 2006 04:01, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > - Support for a Processor Data Area (PDA) on i386. This makes
> > the code more similar to x86-64 and will allow some other
> > optimizations in the future.
>
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `math_emulate':
> (.text+0x3809): undefined reference to `_proxy_pda'
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `smp_apic_timer_interrupt':
> (.text+0xe140): undefined reference to `_proxy_pda'
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `sys_set_tid_address':
> (.text+0x370b): undefined reference to `_proxy_pda'
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `switch_uid':
> (.text+0xcc6c): undefined reference to `_proxy_pda'
> mm/built-in.o: In function `sys_munlock':
> (.text+0xcaf1): undefined reference to `_proxy_pda'
> mm/built-in.o:(.text+0xcc11): more undefined references to `_proxy_pda' follow
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Błąd 1
>
> Something related (git tree fetched 1-2h ago) ?

Probably. Please send your .config.

Cheers,
Muli