From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759172AbWLIGK3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:10:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759182AbWLIGK2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:10:28 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:48788 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759172AbWLIGK0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:10:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:10:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Jackson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin , Andi Kleen , menage@google.com, Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset - rework cpuset_zone_allowed api Message-Id: <20061208221017.0c648b5e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061208112152.12631.67436.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> References: <20061208112152.12631.67436.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:21:52 -0800 Paul Jackson wrote: > From: Paul Jackson > > Elaborate the API for calling cpuset_zone_allowed(), so that users > have to explicitly choose between the two variants: > > cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall() > cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall() > > Until now, whether or not you got the hardwall flavor depended solely > on whether or not you or'd in the __GFP_HARDWALL gfp flag to the > gfp_mask argument. yeah, nice change that.